From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Fainelli Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 6/6] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Flood broadcast frames in hardware Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 12:33:29 -0700 Message-ID: <465be6d8-67d0-d176-1252-abb222bf0528@gmail.com> References: <1506464764-12699-1-git-send-email-andrew@lunn.ch> <1506464764-12699-7-git-send-email-andrew@lunn.ch> <8737786lua.fsf@weeman.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <9733da02-0b69-33f0-de8a-63bc5cae6bb4@gmail.com> <20170927184636.GD12394@lunn.ch> <8760c4t0df.fsf@weeman.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: David Miller , netdev To: Vivien Didelot , Andrew Lunn Return-path: Received: from mail-qk0-f174.google.com ([209.85.220.174]:53114 "EHLO mail-qk0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750739AbdI0Tdf (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Sep 2017 15:33:35 -0400 Received: by mail-qk0-f174.google.com with SMTP id o77so14396974qke.9 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 12:33:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8760c4t0df.fsf@weeman.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Content-Language: en-US Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 09/27/2017 12:19 PM, Vivien Didelot wrote: > Hi Andrew, Florian, > > Andrew Lunn writes: > >> It took me a while to make this work with CONFIG_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING >> enabled. Any change to enable hardware flooding needs careful testing >> for lots of different configurations. This is another reason i don't >> want to do it at the DSA level, until we have a good understanding >> what it means in each individual driver. > > Then if we are worried about how broadcast flooding is handled on > different switches, we can provide a new .flood_broadcast(ds, vid) > switch operation for the drivers to implement. We don't really have a good visibility on the number of switches requiring special configuration for broadcast addresses nor how this would have to happen so it would be a tad difficult to define an appropriate API with a single user. In general, single user "generic" facilities tend to be biased towards their particular problem space (c.f: devlink) so a generic interface to call into HW specific details does not usually sell well... -- Florian