From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Greear Subject: Re: [RFC VLAN 01/10]: Fix off-by-ones in VLAN ID checks Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 09:16:31 -0700 Message-ID: <46658C5F.8050302@candelatech.com> References: <20070605143650.23717.91261.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20070605143651.23717.20253.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Patrick McHardy Return-path: Received: from ns2.lanforge.com ([66.165.47.211]:34146 "EHLO ns2.lanforge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933297AbXFEQQd (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:16:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070605143651.23717.20253.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Patrick McHardy wrote: > [VLAN]: Fix off-by-ones in VLAN ID checks > > The valid range of VLAN IDs is 0-4095, fix using ID 4095. > Per http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/download/802.1Q-1998.pdf page 69 0xFFF is reserved for future use, so we should not be using VLANs with that VID. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com