From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>,
Kirill Korotaev <dev@openvz.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@lists.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Virtual ethernet tunnel (v.2)
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 08:51:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46682976.8050904@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <466826C6.6000206@openvz.org>
Pavel Emelianov wrote:
> Ben Greear wrote:
>
>> Pavel Emelianov wrote:
>>
>>> Veth stands for Virtual ETHernet. It is a simple tunnel driver
>>> that works at the link layer and looks like a pair of ethernet
>>> devices interconnected with each other.
>>>
>>>
>> As Dave mentioned, there is already a driver known as 'veth'. Maybe borrow
>> the etun name as well?
>>
>
> We have already seen that this driver uses ethXXX names for
> its devices and Dave agreed with veth one. Moreover Alexey
> Kuznetsov said that he would prefer the name veth for etun.
>
Ok, fine by me. I started reading mail from the wrong direction this
morning :)
>
>> I would also like some way to identify veth from other device types,
>> preferably
>> something like a value in sysfs. However, that should not hold up
>>
>
> We can do this with ethtool. It can get and print the driver
> name of the device.
>
I think I'd like something in sysfs that we could query for any
interface. Possible return
strings could be:
VLAN
VETH
ETH
PPP
BRIDGE
AP /* wifi access point interface */
STA /* wifi station */
....
I will cook up a patch for consideration after veth goes in.
>> I think you need at least the option to zero out the time-stamp,
>> otherwise it will
>> not be re-calculated when received on the peer, and it potentially spent
>> significant
>> time since it was last calculated (think netem delay or similar).
>>
>> + /* Zero out the time-stamp so that receiving code is forced
>> + * to recalculate it.
>> + */
>> + skb->tstamp.off_sec = 0;
>> + skb->tstamp.off_usec = 0;
>>
>>
>>> +
>>> + rcv_priv = netdev_priv(rcv);
>>> + skb->pkt_type = PACKET_HOST;
>>> + skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, rcv);
>>> + if (dev->features & NETIF_F_NO_CSUM)
>>> + skb->ip_summed = rcv_priv->ip_summed;
>>> +
>>> + dst_release(skb->dst);
>>> + skb->dst = NULL;
>>> + secpath_reset(skb);
>>> + nf_reset(skb);
>>> + skb->mark = 0;
>>> +
>>> + length = skb->len;
>>>
>>>
>> This should be done before you do the eth_type_trans, as that pulls the
>> header and your
>> byte counters will be off.
>>
>
> This will be ETH_HLEN larger, do you mean this? I think this is
> normal as this device tries to look like an "iron" ethernet card :)
>
For device counters, it should count the number of bytes received,
including all headers,
but excluding the ethernet FCS. If an 'iron' card did differently, I'd
consider it a bug.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-07 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-07 11:13 [PATCH] Virtual ethernet tunnel (v.2) Pavel Emelianov
2007-06-07 11:16 ` [PATCH] Module for ip utility to support veth device (v.2) Pavel Emelianov
2007-06-07 15:59 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-06-07 15:23 ` [PATCH] Virtual ethernet tunnel (v.2) Ben Greear
2007-06-07 15:39 ` Pavel Emelianov
2007-06-07 15:51 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2007-06-07 16:04 ` Pavel Emelianov
2007-06-07 16:35 ` Ben Greear
2007-06-08 16:00 ` Pavel Emelianov
2007-06-08 17:00 ` Ben Greear
2007-06-08 19:49 ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2007-06-08 23:46 ` Ben Greear
2007-06-11 11:42 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46682976.8050904@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dev@openvz.org \
--cc=dlezcano@fr.ibm.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).