From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] NET: Multiqueue network device support. Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:13:54 -0400 Message-ID: <466F0C92.5080306@garzik.org> References: <466DEF9D.9070509@trash.net> <1181615384.4071.121.camel@localhost> <466E9DF2.9010505@trash.net> <20070612.140240.00078635.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , kaber@trash.net, hadi@cyberus.ca, peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com, auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:58251 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751013AbXFLVN7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:13:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070612.140240.00078635.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org If hardware w/ multiple queues will the capability for different MAC addresses, different RX filters, etc. does it make sense to add that below the net_device level? We will have to add all the configuration machinery at the per-queue level that already exists at the per-netdev level. Jeff