Re: [PATCH] Virtual ethernet tunnel

[Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>]

Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Pavel Emelianov wrote:
>> Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>
>>> The question is how to proceed. I haven't read all mails yet, but it
>>> seems there is some disagreement about whether to create all devices
>>> in the same namespace and move them later or create them directly in
>>
>> The agreement was that we can make any of the above. We can create
>> booth devices in the init namespace and then move one of them into the
>> desired namespace, or we can explicitly specify which namespace to create
>> the pair in.
> 
> 
> I'm going to push my latest patches to Dave today, the easiest way is
> probably is you just add whatever you need to the API afterwards.
> 
> 

OK. Dave didn't object against the driver. Hope he will accept it as well.

I have also found a BUG in your API. Look, when you declare the alias with
the MODULE_ALIAS_RTNL_LINK in drivers you use strings as an argument. But 
this macro stringifyes the argument itself which results in bad aliases.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>

---

diff --git a/include/net/rtnetlink.h b/include/net/rtnetlink.h
index d744198..f627e1f 100644
--- a/include/net/rtnetlink.h
+++ b/include/net/rtnetlink.h
@@ -77,6 +77,6 @@ extern void	__rtnl_link_unregister(struc
 extern int	rtnl_link_register(struct rtnl_link_ops *ops);
 extern void	rtnl_link_unregister(struct rtnl_link_ops *ops);
 
-#define MODULE_ALIAS_RTNL_LINK(name) MODULE_ALIAS("rtnl-link-" #name)
+#define MODULE_ALIAS_RTNL_LINK(name) MODULE_ALIAS("rtnl-link-" name)
 
 #endif