From: Peter Rasmussen <plr@udgaard.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IC Plus Corp IC Plus IP1000
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:16:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46705E9A.9060903@udgaard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <466F548E.9010807@garzik.org>
Thank you for your suggestion.
I do however, have the following issues, which is also why I searched
Google for help on it.
1.The Sundance driver is in the 100mbit section, implying that it won't
work with 1gbit.
2.When I first started up the server I am using with the ethernet
device, it didn't detect it, even with the Sundance driver compiled in
to the kernel, so I gave up on it.
3.Now I would like to extend the server with another ethernet device,
and I would prefer to use what is already installed instead of having to
buy another additonal ethernet board.
4.While searching for the driver code with Google, it seemed that
several people would like to see a IC Plus Corp IC Plus IP1000 driver in
the kernel, and nowhere did I see that using the present Sundance driver
was adequate.
5.I am not able to reboot this server too often (it is a live web
server) so I would like to prepare as much as possible before rebooting it.
So, does your suggestion include:
1.The possibility to use the device in gigabit mode?
2.How to tweak the present Sundance driver to better detect a "IC Plus
Corp IC Plus IP1000" board?
3.Or *is* the Sundance driver supposed to be a generic driver for all
their boards, including >100mbit?
If you can tell me about that, or give me pointers to figure it out, I'd
be much obliged!
Thanks,
Peter
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Peter Rasmussen wrote:
>> I am not on this list, but found this address on:
>> http://linux-net.osdl.org/index.php/Mailing_Lists.
>>
>> My question is regarding the ethernet controller (from lspci):
>>
>> Sundance Technology Inc / IC Plus Corp IC Plus IP1000 Family Gigabit
>> Ethernet (rev 41)
>>
>> that seems to have a driver for it published on:
>>
>> http://www.icplus.com.tw/driver-pp-IP1000A.html
>>
>> Unfortunately I am not able to build it as described.
>>
>> I wonder if it at some time will be included in the standard Linux
>> kernel?
>> I am of course interested because my main board has it built in, so I
>> would be willing to test it.
>
> Use the 'sundance' driver that's been in the kernel for quite a while.
>
> Jeff
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-13 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-27 15:11 IC Plus Corp IC Plus IP1000 Peter Rasmussen
2007-06-13 2:21 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-06-13 21:16 ` Peter Rasmussen [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-06-13 1:57 linux
2007-06-13 18:24 ` linux
2007-06-14 2:43 linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46705E9A.9060903@udgaard.com \
--to=plr@udgaard.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).