From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
"bugme-daemon@kernel-bugs.osdl.org"
<bugme-daemon@kernel-bugs.osdl.org>,
ranko@spidernet.net
Subject: Re: [NET]: gen_estimator: fix locking and timer related bugs [Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 8668] New: HTB Deadlock]
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 14:23:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4683A848.5040907@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070628091339.GC1618@ff.dom.local>
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>> @@ -202,7 +201,6 @@ void gen_kill_estimator(struct gnet_stats_basic *bstats,
>> struct gen_estimator *est, **pest;
>>
>> for (idx=0; idx <= EST_MAX_INTERVAL; idx++) {
>> - int killed = 0;
>> pest = &elist[idx].list;
>> while ((est=*pest) != NULL) {
>
> So, maybe this list walking here needs some locking too?
It depends on whether estimators should be able to rely on
the rtnl in the future or be completely responsible for their
own locking. My patch yesterday was made under the assumption
that they shouldn't rely on external locking, which seemed to
be the right thing for a "generic" implementation. OTOH its
still specific to networking, so relying on the rtnl doesn't
sound too unreasonable too. I'm beginning to thing I made
the wrong choice with my patch.
I'm busy right now, would you mind looking into a patch that
only deals with the timer races, but still relies on the
rtnl?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-28 12:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-8668-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2007-06-25 5:24 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 8668] New: HTB Deadlock Andrew Morton
2007-06-25 9:28 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-25 9:30 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-25 11:37 ` Ranko Zivojnovic
2007-06-27 11:45 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-06-27 11:44 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-27 12:10 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-06-27 12:30 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-06-27 14:53 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-27 15:09 ` [NET]: gen_estimator: fix locking and timer related bugs [Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 8668] New: HTB Deadlock] Patrick McHardy
2007-06-27 15:25 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-28 6:54 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-06-28 9:56 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-06-28 9:13 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-06-28 12:23 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2007-06-28 13:03 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-06-28 12:55 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-28 13:27 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-06-29 7:02 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-06-29 7:56 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-06-28 7:52 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 8668] New: HTB Deadlock Jarek Poplawski
2007-06-28 12:24 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-28 13:18 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-06-28 13:16 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4683A848.5040907@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bugme-daemon@kernel-bugs.osdl.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jarkao2@o2.pl \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ranko@spidernet.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).