From: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
To: Marian Balakowicz <m8@semihalf.com>, bjorn.helgaas@hp.com
Cc: linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, len.brown@intel.com,
NetDev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: quirk_e100_interrupt() called too early
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 09:01:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4683DB44.9070704@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4683A80F.5020605@semihalf.com>
Marian Balakowicz wrote:
> I am enabling and testing PCI on tqm5200 mpc5200 based board where I
> faced the following issue.
>
> I am using EEPRO100 PCI card for which there is specific
> quirk_e100_interrupt that tries to disable interrupts if
> they were left enabled by the firmware. quirk_e100_interrupts() is
> called after PCI controller is initialized and before PCI bus
> enumeration is performed. On some powerpc platforms, like the one I am
> using, PCI controller configuration sets different MEM and IO windows
> than those set by firmware. That is why quirk_e100_interrupt() is
> causing kernel panic as it tries to read from device BAR0 offets which
> at this time point to a invalid PCI window (set by firmware).
>
> The patch below delays the quirk_100_interrupt() to pci_fixup_final
> phase, which happens after bus enumeration and before device PCI enable
> and device driver initialization - so, it seem to be still a good place
> for this quirk. It works fine for me but I only tested it on a tqm5200.
> Could someone please help and verify that on other platforms?
will try to do. This sounds indeed like the proper thing to do. Unfortunately I
don't have any NICs to repro this on (allthough I have a ppc box with said
firmware probe method).
Bjorn orignially wrote this patch, perhaps he can comment on the fixup move?
Also, please send a signed-off-by patch so I can push it forward as usual.
Cheers,
Auke
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> index 01d8f8a..7194074 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> @@ -1475,7 +1475,7 @@ static void __devinit quirk_e100_interru
>
> iounmap(csr);
> }
> -DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_ANY_ID,
> quirk_e100_interrupt);
> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_ANY_ID,
> quirk_e100_interrupt);
>
> static void __devinit fixup_rev1_53c810(struct pci_dev* dev)
> {
next parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-28 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4683A80F.5020605@semihalf.com>
2007-06-28 16:01 ` Kok, Auke [this message]
2007-06-29 2:07 ` quirk_e100_interrupt() called too early Bjorn Helgaas
2007-07-02 8:07 ` Nils Rennebarth
2007-07-02 19:03 ` Kok, Auke
2007-07-03 9:00 ` Marian Balakowicz
2007-07-03 9:03 ` [PATCH] PCI: " Marian Balakowicz
2007-07-17 17:21 ` patch pci-quirk_e100_interrupt-called-too-early.patch added to gregkh-2.6 tree gregkh
2007-07-17 17:26 ` Kok, Auke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4683DB44.9070704@intel.com \
--to=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=m8@semihalf.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).