From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/21] r8169: merge with version 6.001.00 of Realtek's r8169 driver Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 05:47:40 -0400 Message-ID: <468626BC.80805@pobox.com> References: <20070629201212.GA3240@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <20070629202510.GL3240@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <1183149335.2642.10.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <46857068.4050803@pobox.com> <20070630094138.GB13042@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Arjan van de Ven , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Edward Hsu To: Francois Romieu Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:34970 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754227AbXF3Jrq (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jun 2007 05:47:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070630094138.GB13042@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Francois Romieu wrote: > Jeff Garzik : >> Arjan van de Ven wrote: >>>> + pci_write_config_byte(tp->pci_dev, PCI_LATENCY_TIMER, 0x40); >>> can you create a pci_set_latency_timer() for this please? > [...] >>>> + if (tp->mac_version <= RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_06) >>>> + pci_write_config_byte(tp->pci_dev, PCI_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, >>>> 0x08); >>> and something for this as well? >> Why? Nothing here seems generic to me. > > I.e. no need for pci_set_latency_timer(struct pci_dev *dev, u8 latency) > neither pci_set_cache_line_size(struct pci_dev *dev, u8 size) ? Yeah. When it gets to be a one-line wrapper like that, I don't see much additional value in pci_set_cache_line_size() over pci_write_config_byte(,PCI_CACHE_LINE_SIZE,). Jeff