From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Emelianov Subject: Re: [PATCH] Virtual ethernet device (v2.1) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:24:20 +0400 Message-ID: <4694CBF4.8090303@openvz.org> References: <4694A363.2070406@openvz.org> <200707111254.24352.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , Patrick McHardy , Linux Netdev List , Daniel Lezcano , Ben Greear , devel@openvz.org, Kirill Korotaev To: Christian Borntraeger Return-path: Received: from mailhub.sw.ru ([195.214.233.200]:21552 "EHLO relay.sw.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764061AbXGKMYY (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:24:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200707111254.24352.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Christian Borntraeger wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 11. Juli 2007 schrieb Pavel Emelianov: >> drivers/net/veth.c | 452 >> include/net/veth.h | 14 + > > I know, I am late in the game, but wont the name collide somewhat with > drivers/net/ibmveth.h, drivers/net/iseries_veth.c, and drivers/net/ibmveth.c? David asked the same thing after v.1. The answer is : No it will not. These devices use eth%d strings to generate their names. > Christian > Thanks, Pavel