From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: pmtu discovery on SA Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 18:27:27 +0200 Message-ID: <469E3F6F.6040004@trash.net> References: <469A3698.5020105@trash.net> <3C59DB883F7B0B4D8096010D45ACCD1323022E@exch.facton.local> <3C59DB883F7B0B4D8096010D45ACCD1323023A@exch.facton.local> <469B7001.3090604@trash.net> <3C59DB883F7B0B4D8096010D45ACCD1323023D@exch.facton.local> <469B7B99.6040402@trash.net> <3C59DB883F7B0B4D8096010D45ACCD13230240@exch.facton.local> <469B878C.1020204@trash.net> <469B8C47.3030306@trash.net> <3C59DB883F7B0B4D8096010D45ACCD13230242@exch.facton.local> <469BB50C.10203@trash.net> <469CE9E5.7040003@trash.net> <3C59DB883F7B0B4D8096010D45ACCD1323024F@exch.facton.local> <469D3885.7070208@trash.net> <3C59DB883F7B0B4D8096010D45ACCD13230254@exch.facton.local> <469E1242.3050105@trash.net> <3C59DB883F7B0B4D8096010D45ACCD13230257@exch.facton.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Beschorner Daniel Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:42599 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761000AbXGRQ17 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:27:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <3C59DB883F7B0B4D8096010D45ACCD13230257@exch.facton.local> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Beschorner Daniel wrote: >>Beschorner Daniel wrote: >> >>So its using 1492 now? Otherwise it would be expected since the >>initial MTU calculation would be based on 1500. > > > I'm using 1500 again. > > Just to make it clear: Is this message an error, or a warning or just > for information? > Could you explain a bit please. Its a debugging message nowadays (NETDEBUG). I was mostly interested in this since I changed the IPsec MTU calculation in 2.6.22 and it might have been a bug. > I have no connections hangs or other kind of problems. Thanks for clarifying this. I guess the reason why you're seeing them now and not before is that we're now always using the maximum room available, while previously packets were usually a bit smaller than possible.