From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: updated tcatm patches for kernel/iproute 2.6.22 Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:22:09 +0200 Message-ID: <469F6581.3020400@trash.net> References: <20070718210638.bs44zz4veowqf2kr@m.safari.iki.fi> <469E9B24.2080002@trash.net> <20070719113559.4y2z4bj4vwtglupw@m.safari.iki.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linux Networking Mailing List To: safari-kernel@safari.iki.fi Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:34426 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751651AbXGSNZe (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jul 2007 09:25:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070719113559.4y2z4bj4vwtglupw@m.safari.iki.fi> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Sami Farin wrote: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 00:58:44 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > >> Let me repeat again before we get in an endless discussion >> again - I will NACK these patches until we have a solution >> that works for all qdiscs. >> > > I googled for > "Accurate packet scheduling for ATM" mchardy > and found some threads from 2006. > > http://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg15706.html > http://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg21395.html > > So, Patrick: Please keep me as receipient or CC when talking to me. > 1) what is this "solution"? do you have code? > or a brief explanation... Simply calculcate the length including additional encapsulation overhead at runtime. This allows all qdiscs to use the wire-length in their calculations. > 2) are you still working on this? is somebody else? > Not to my knowledge. > 3) do you have patches for iproute/kernel 2.6.22? No. > 4) if you have some patches, but they are not yet > complete, what else needs to be done? > Not sure, its been a while since I posted some example patches. Its not much work, probably quicker to start over.