From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4][RFC] lro: Generic Large Receive Offload for TCP traffic Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:17:58 -0400 Message-ID: <46AE0F36.8030605@garzik.org> References: <200707301724.33865.ossthema@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Thomas Klein , Jan-Bernd Themann , netdev , linux-kernel , linux-ppc , Christoph Raisch , Marcus Eder , Andrew Gallatin , Stefan Roscher To: Jan-Bernd Themann , David Miller Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200707301724.33865.ossthema@de.ibm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppd-linuxppc64-dev=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppd-linuxppc64-dev=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Seems pretty good to me, save for one minor detail: patches #1/#2 should be combined together for greater git-bisect happiness. Ditto for patches #3/#4. Largely harmless in this case, but keeps the git history pollution to a minimum. Caveat reviewer: I'm not an expert of net/ipv4/* code, so I reviewed largely from the driver API perspective. David, thoughts on merging? I'm not We could stick this into your tree or mine. Whether yours or mine, I would like to keep the driver and net-core patches together in the same git tree. Jeff