From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Kok, Auke" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4][RFC] ehea: LRO support Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 09:37:36 -0700 Message-ID: <46AE13D0.7060902@intel.com> References: <200707301724.49829.ossthema@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Thomas Klein , Jeff Garzik , Jan-Bernd Themann , netdev , linux-kernel , linux-ppc , Christoph Raisch , Marcus Eder , Andrew Gallatin , Stefan Roscher , David Miller To: Jan-Bernd Themann Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200707301724.49829.ossthema@de.ibm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppd-linuxppc64-dev=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppd-linuxppc64-dev=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Jan-Bernd Themann wrote: > Added LRO support using the "SKB aggregate" interface > > Signed-off-by: Jan-Bernd Themann > > --- > drivers/net/ehea/ehea.h | 9 ++++- > drivers/net/ehea/ehea_ethtool.c | 15 +++++++ > drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 3 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > +module_param(use_lro, int, 0); > +module_param(lro_max_aggr, int, 0); this should obviously (and Stephen H. probably agrees) be implemented in ethtool instead, and opens up the question as to what changes we need to add to ethtool. .. Auke