From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] lro: Generic Large Receive Offload for TCP traffic Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 02:31:11 -0400 Message-ID: <46BAB4AF.7010001@garzik.org> References: <200708031441.14780.ossthema@de.ibm.com> <20070808.231144.22645124.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ossthema@de.ibm.com, raisch@de.ibm.com, themann@de.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, meder@de.ibm.com, tklein@de.ibm.com, gallatin@myri.com, stefan.roscher@de.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:55914 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759068AbXHIGbS (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Aug 2007 02:31:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070808.231144.22645124.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org David Miller wrote: > From: Jan-Bernd Themann > Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 14:41:14 +0200 > >> I think this patch could be the final version for now. It has been tested >> on two platforms (power and x86_64) and works very well. > > I checked in the LRO patch and the two sample driver ports > to net-2.6.24, thanks! Good to hear, thanks all. I'll ponder whether I want to rebase netdev-2.6.git#upstream (2.6.24 queue) on top of net-2.6.24. I might put it off until the pain threshold rises, or I might go ahead and do it. Undecided. Either way, I'll want you to push to Linus before I do, when the next merge window opens. Jeff