From: Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, ak@suse.de, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
davem@davemloft.net, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
wensong@linux-vs.org, horms@verge.net.au, wjiang@resilience.com,
cfriesen@nortel.com, zlynx@acm.org, rpjday@mindspring.com,
jesper.juhl@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently on alpha
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 15:24:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46BB69F8.5000502@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070809184531.GH8424@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 02:13:52PM -0400, Chris Snook wrote:
>> Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 01:14:35PM -0400, Chris Snook wrote:
>>>> If you're depending on volatile writes
>>>> being visible to other CPUs, you're screwed either way, because the CPU
>>>> can hold that data in cache as long as it wants before it writes it to
>>>> memory. When this finally does happen, it will happen atomically, which
>>>> is all that atomic_set guarantees. If you need to guarantee that the
>>>> value is written to memory at a particular time in your execution
>>>> sequence, you either have to read it from memory to force the compiler to
>>>> store it first (and a volatile cast in atomic_read will suffice for this)
>>>> or you have to use LOCK_PREFIX instructions which will invalidate remote
>>>> cache lines containing the same variable. This patch doesn't change
>>>> either of these cases.
>>> The case that it -can- change is interactions with interrupt handlers.
>>> And NMI/SMI handlers, for that matter.
>> You have a point here, but only if you can guarantee that the interrupt
>> handler is running on a processor sharing the cache that has the
>> not-yet-written volatile value. That implies a strictly non-SMP
>> architecture. At the moment, none of those have volatile in their
>> declaration of atomic_t, so this patch can't break any of them.
>
> This can also happen when using per-CPU variables. And there are a
> number of per-CPU variables that are either atomic themselves or are
> structures containing atomic fields.
Accessing per-CPU variables in this fashion reliably already requires a suitable
smp/non-smp read/write memory barrier. I maintain that if we break anything
with this change, it was really already broken, if less obviously. Can you give
a real or synthetic example of legitimate code that could break?
-- Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-09 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-09 13:24 [PATCH 1/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently on alpha Chris Snook
2007-08-09 14:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-08-09 14:53 ` Chris Snook
2007-08-09 15:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-08-09 15:24 ` Chris Snook
2007-08-09 15:50 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-09 16:20 ` Chris Snook
2007-08-09 18:38 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-09 19:05 ` Chris Snook
2007-08-09 19:19 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-09 19:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-08-09 19:47 ` Chris Snook
2007-08-09 23:02 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-09 16:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-08-09 16:36 ` Chris Snook
2007-08-09 16:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-08-09 17:14 ` Chris Snook
2007-08-09 17:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-08-09 18:13 ` Chris Snook
2007-08-09 18:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-08-09 19:24 ` Chris Snook [this message]
2007-08-10 1:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-08-10 19:49 ` Chris Snook
2007-08-10 20:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-08-09 19:17 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-09 18:51 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-09 19:30 ` Chris Snook
2007-08-10 8:21 ` Herbert Xu
2007-08-10 9:08 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-10 15:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-08-10 20:07 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-11 0:00 ` Herbert Xu
2007-08-11 0:38 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-11 0:43 ` Herbert Xu
2007-08-11 0:50 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-11 4:38 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46BB69F8.5000502@redhat.com \
--to=csnook@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cfriesen@nortel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rpjday@mindspring.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wensong@linux-vs.org \
--cc=wjiang@resilience.com \
--cc=zlynx@acm.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).