From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc2-mm1
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 15:27:26 -0400
Message-ID: <46BB6A9E.5070300@garzik.org>
References: <20070809015106.cd0bfc53.akpm@linux-foundation.org>	<46BB155D.8050501@googlemail.com>	<20070809113710.bc0e3b80.akpm@linux-foundation.org>	<6bffcb0e0708091204h38f137a7w6475a229199608c6@mail.gmail.com> <20070809121034.3aac9da2.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:51272 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1761282AbXHIT13 (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 9 Aug 2007 15:27:29 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20070809121034.3aac9da2.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

Andrew Morton wrote:
> umm, I was hoping to find out which of those two patches was the cuplrit.
> Almost surely it was 9ee6b32a47b9abc565466a9c3b127a5246b452e5?


Highly likely it is my patch in #ALL.

	Jeff