From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Driver writer hints (was [PATCH 3/4] Add ETHTOOL_[GS]PFLAGS sub-ioctls)
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 16:45:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46BCCE57.1060802@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070810202630.GB25095@havoc.gtf.org>
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> commit 4901236cec047029b970261b95e47d6be60f523e
> Author: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
> Date: Fri Aug 10 15:52:06 2007 -0400
>
> [ETHTOOL] Introduce ->{get,set}_priv_flags, ETHTOOL_[GS]PFLAGS
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
>
> include/linux/ethtool.h | 8 +++++++-
> net/core/ethtool.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
This change permits driver writers to allow userspace to enable/disable
driver-specific boolean options on a per-interface basis. This is best
illustrated by describing how userland uses this:
(this is very similar to how the get-stats and self-test operations
currently work)
1) Userland issues ETHTOOL_GDRVINFO, to obtain the n_priv_flags value.
2) Userland issues ETHTOOL_GSTRINGS (ETH_SS_PRIV_FLAGS) to obtain an
array of strings. Each element in this array maps to a bit in the list
of driver-private flags. Array element #0 is the tag (name) for bit #0.
Array element #5 is the tag for bit #5. etc.
If we are getting (retrieving) flags:
3) Userland issues ETHTOOL_GPFLAGS, to obtain a 32-bit bitmap
4) Userland prints out a tag returned from ETHTOOL_GSTRINGS
for each bit set to one in the bitmap. If a bit is set,
but there is no string to describe it, that bit is ignored.
(i.e. a list of 5 strings is returned, but bit 24 is set)
If we are setting flags:
3) Userland issues ETHTOOL_GPFLAGS, to obtain 32-bit bitmap
4) Userland parses command line, which has a series of strings
in the format of "+option" (set flag) and "-option" (clear
flag).
5) Userland sets and clears bits in the 32-bit bitmap, by
matching the command line-supplied data with strings returned
by ETHTOOL_GSTRINGS.
6) If the bitmap has changed, send it back to the driver using
ETHTOOL_SPFLAGS.
In this way, you can see that the actual bit numbers are irrelevant, and
need not be a fixed part of the ABI. Everything is named-based.
This name-based stuff only applies to the private flags. The
ETHTOOL_[GS]FLAGS operations /do/ fix the bit numbers in stone, in the
ABI. There is no name list associated with ETHTOOL_[GS]FLAGS]. The
userland interface does, however, use names rather than bit numbers, for
ease of use.
Another attribute is worth pointing out at this point: ETHTOOL_SFLAGS
and ETHTOOL_SPFLAGS both permit atomic retrieval/setting of groups of
features all at once. IMO this is a nice addition to ethtool as well,
where previously you had to issue separate ioctls for each feature,
which might result in repeated NIC resets [depending on driver
implementation].
Get-flags and get-priv-flags are unpriveleged operations. Set-flags and
set-priv-flags require CAP_NET_ADMIN like other ethtool sub-ioctls.
Drivers should return -EINVAL if userland attempts to set an invariant
(read-only) flag to something other than its constant value.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-10 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-10 20:24 [PATCH 1/4] Add ETHTOOL_[GS]FLAGS sub-ioctls Jeff Garzik
2007-08-10 20:25 ` [PATCH 2/4] ethtool: introduce get_sset_count Jeff Garzik
2007-08-10 20:26 ` [PATCH 3/4] Add ETHTOOL_[GS]PFLAGS sub-ioctls Jeff Garzik
2007-08-10 20:45 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2007-08-10 21:01 ` Driver writer hints (was [PATCH 3/4] Add ETHTOOL_[GS]PFLAGS sub-ioctls) Rick Jones
2007-08-10 21:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-08-10 20:26 ` [PATCH 4/4] ethtool: internal simplification Jeff Garzik
2007-08-10 20:56 ` [PATCH 1/4] Add ETHTOOL_[GS]FLAGS sub-ioctls Jeff Garzik
2007-08-15 23:05 ` David Miller
2007-08-10 21:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-08-10 21:11 ` Ben Greear
2007-08-10 22:10 ` David Miller
2007-08-10 22:40 ` Ben Greear
2007-08-10 22:46 ` David Miller
2007-08-10 23:15 ` Rick Jones
2007-08-14 20:38 ` Kok, Auke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46BCCE57.1060802@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).