From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rick Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Add ETHTOOL_[GS]FLAGS sub-ioctls Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 16:15:59 -0700 Message-ID: <46BCF1AF.3080000@hp.com> References: <46BCD47C.9060408@candelatech.com> <20070810.151039.31642625.davem@davemloft.net> <46BCE942.1030107@candelatech.com> <20070810.154601.98709831.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: greearb@candelatech.com, jeff@garzik.org, auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070810.154601.98709831.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org David Miller wrote: > From: Ben Greear > Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:40:02 -0700 > > >>For GSO on output, is there a generic fallback for any driver that >>does not specifically implement GSO? > > > Absolutely, in fact that's mainly what it's there for. > > I don't think there is any issue. The knob is there via > ethtool for people who really want to disable it. Just to be paranoid (who me?) we are then at a point where what happened a couple months ago with forwarding between 10G and IPoIB won't happen again - where things failed because a 10G NIC had LRO enabled by default? rick jones