From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rick Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] e1000e: remove namespace collisions with e1000 Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 09:41:45 -0700 Message-ID: <46C1DB49.1080601@hp.com> References: <20070810200038.21509.77815.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20070810200047.21509.46779.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <46C139F6.2040007@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Auke Kok , netdev@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, andi@firstfloor.org To: Jeff Garzik Return-path: Received: from palrel13.hp.com ([156.153.255.238]:39299 "EHLO palrel13.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764797AbXHNQmd (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Aug 2007 12:42:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <46C139F6.2040007@garzik.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org > if you grep around this effort was already started using the 'e1e_' > prefix. I like the shorter prefix, but your call ultimately. Either > way, make sure to make the driver consistent there too. should it then be consistent with the overall driver name too? certainly calling things e1e or e1ke or heck, even elke if one wanted to be a triffle playful would certainly help distinguish this driver from its grandfather. rick jones