From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: Fwd: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 08:36:52 -0400 Message-ID: <46DAAE64.3070203@garzik.org> References: <200709010140.l811eq9H005896@cvs.openbsd.org> <46D99FB7.6030505@garzik.org> <20070901205457.GK9260@stusta.de> <20070902113638.78fbd202@the-village.bc.nu> <20070902115041.GM16016@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Adrian Bunk , Alan Cox , "Constantine A. Murenin" , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Jiri Slaby To: Igor Sobrado Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-wireless-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Igor Sobrado wrote: > When code is multi-licensed it must be distributed under *all* these > licensing terms concurrently. It is easy to understand. Removing (or > changing) the conditions that apply to the program from the source code > and documentation *without* an authorization from all the author(s) is > illegal. The plain English in the dual-license text directly contradicts this fiction. Jeff