From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oliver Hartkopp Subject: Re: Network Namespace status Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:03:56 +0200 Message-ID: <46EA244C.1050702@hartkopp.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linux Containers , netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Miller , Tejun Heo , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , Urs Thuermann To: "Eric W. Biederman" Return-path: Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de ([81.169.146.162]:22099 "EHLO mo-p00-ob.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750832AbXINGFZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Sep 2007 02:05:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Looking into my patch queue I have: > 5 patches for cleaning up and making a per network namespace loopback device. > 4 patches for making rtnetlink message processing per network namespace > 1 patch for making AF_UNIX per network namespace > 1 patch for making AF_PACKET per network namespace > > The ipv4 part of my patchset is currently working but it needs some > more cleanup and reordering of patches before it is ready to go anywhere. > Nothing has been done for ipv6, but the changes should very much parallel > ipv4. > > The other protocols I haven't even looked at yet. > Hi Eric, can you send me your current AF_PACKET patch? I just want to update our recent post of the CAN (controller area network) subsystem (AF_CAN) which is (in some parts) similar to AF_PACKET. So i can take a look on it to provide the latest technique in the next post ... Thanks, Oliver