netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
To: L F <lfabio.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: e1000 driver and samba
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:59:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46EAF644.1040006@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <780b6f780709141140l1fd586c9p2aa8efe6ed803d38@mail.gmail.com>

L F wrote:
> On 9/14/07, Kok, Auke <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com> wrote:
>> this slowness might have been masking the issue
> That is possible. However, it worked for upwards of twelve months
> without an error.
> 
>> I have not yet seen other reports of this issue, and it would be interesting to
>> see if the stack or driver is seeing errors. Please post `ethtool -S eth0` after
>> the samba connection resets or fails.
> If you look for it on the Realtek cards, there had been sporadic
> issues up to late 2005. The solution posted universally was 'change
> card'.
> 
> I include the content of ethtool -S as requested:
> beehive:~# ethtool -S eth4
> NIC statistics:
>      rx_packets: 43538709
>      tx_packets: 68726231
>      rx_bytes: 34124849453
>      tx_bytes: 74817483835
>      rx_broadcast: 20891
>      tx_broadcast: 8941
>      rx_multicast: 459
>      tx_multicast: 0
>      rx_errors: 0
>      tx_errors: 0
>      tx_dropped: 0
>      multicast: 459
>      collisions: 0
>      rx_length_errors: 0
>      rx_over_errors: 0
>      rx_crc_errors: 0
>      rx_frame_errors: 0
>      rx_no_buffer_count: 0
>      rx_missed_errors: 0
>      tx_aborted_errors: 0
>      tx_carrier_errors: 0
>      tx_fifo_errors: 0
>      tx_heartbeat_errors: 0
>      tx_window_errors: 0
>      tx_abort_late_coll: 0
>      tx_deferred_ok: 486
>      tx_single_coll_ok: 0
>      tx_multi_coll_ok: 0
>      tx_timeout_count: 0
>      tx_restart_queue: 0
>      rx_long_length_errors: 0
>      rx_short_length_errors: 0
>      rx_align_errors: 0
>      tx_tcp_seg_good: 0
>      tx_tcp_seg_failed: 0
>      rx_flow_control_xon: 488
>      rx_flow_control_xoff: 488
>      tx_flow_control_xon: 0
>      tx_flow_control_xoff: 0
>      rx_long_byte_count: 34124849453
>      rx_csum_offload_good: 43449333
>      rx_csum_offload_errors: 0
>      rx_header_split: 0
>      alloc_rx_buff_failed: 0
>      tx_smbus: 0
>      rx_smbus: 0
>      dropped_smbus: 0
> 
> I am no expert, but I do not see anything that obviously points to an
> issue there.
> Now, something I did not mention before, though it was clearly evident
> from context, is that the errors ONLY occur on samba WRITE. I can read
> hundreds of GBs of data without error.

can you describe your setup a bit more in detail? you're writing from a linux 
client to a windows smb server? or even to a linux server? which end sees the 
connection drop? the samba server? the samba linux client?

Auke

  reply	other threads:[~2007-09-14 20:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-14  2:04 e1000 driver and samba L F
2007-09-14 17:18 ` Kok, Auke
2007-09-14 18:40   ` L F
2007-09-14 20:59     ` Kok, Auke [this message]
2007-09-15  0:37       ` L F
2007-09-15  5:09         ` Bill Fink
2007-09-15 12:27           ` L F
2007-09-15 12:44             ` L F
2007-09-15 17:44       ` James Chapman
2007-09-15 19:07         ` Kok, Auke
2007-09-16  4:06           ` L F
2007-09-16  5:04             ` Kok, Auke
2007-09-17 16:42               ` L F
2007-09-17 17:02                 ` Kok, Auke
2007-09-17 18:58                   ` L F
2007-09-17 21:01                     ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2007-09-18  6:03                       ` Bill Fink
2007-09-18  7:45                         ` Urs Thuermann
2007-09-18  8:47                           ` Bill Fink
2007-09-18 13:39                           ` Florian Weimer
2007-09-18 16:32                             ` L F
2007-09-18 17:04                               ` Tantilov, Emil S
2007-09-19 14:53                                 ` L F
2007-09-20  2:51                                   ` Bill Fink
2007-09-21 14:08                                     ` L F
2007-09-20  4:53                                   ` Bill Fink
2007-09-18 16:44                             ` Bill Fink
2007-09-17 18:02               ` Rick Jones
2007-09-17 18:51                 ` Kok, Auke
2007-09-16 16:24           ` James Chapman
2007-09-16 20:03             ` Kok, Auke
2007-09-16  4:07         ` L F
2007-09-14 18:26 ` Francois Romieu
2007-09-14 18:41   ` L F
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-09-20 23:30 Bruce Cole
2007-09-21 14:13 ` L F
2007-09-21 18:21   ` Bruce Cole
2007-09-21 21:49 ` Francois Romieu
2007-09-21 22:01   ` Bruce Cole
2007-09-21 22:41     ` Francois Romieu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46EAF644.1040006@intel.com \
    --to=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
    --cc=lfabio.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).