From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vlad Yasevich Subject: Re: [v3 PATCH 0/2] Add RCU locking to SCTPaddress management Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:44:45 -0400 Message-ID: <46EE84CD.2070104@hp.com> References: <11897120771278-git-send-email-vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> <20070916.160102.54198849.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from atlrel6.hp.com ([156.153.255.205]:37557 "EHLO atlrel6.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753166AbXIQNpB (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:45:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070916.160102.54198849.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org David Miller wrote: > From: Vlad Yasevich > Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:34:35 -0400 > >> Thanks to Sridhar Samudral and Paul McKenney for all the help and comments. >> I think this is a final version, unless someone else can spot more problems. >> I've ran this under heavy load and it the patches behaves well. >> >> I think patch 1 is a candidate for 2.6.23 since it fixes a bug, but splitting >> these seems a bit odd to me. I'll leave it to DaveM to decide where to >> put them. > > Since you tested this well, I've decided to put both of these > patches into net-2.6 > > I agree it's stupid to split them up. > > There'll be some merge hassles when I rebase net-2.6.24, but > that tree is such a monster that this is inevitable for every > bug fix I queue up for 2.6.23 :-) > Thanks Dave. If you want me to take a look at these issues, let me know. -vlad