From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
To: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: drop association of connection-less socket
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:28:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46F0CFB9.30808@redhat.com> (raw)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The Linux man page for connect(2) currently says:
Connectionless sockets may dissolve the association by connecting to
an address with the sa_family member of sockaddr set to AF_UNSPEC.
No such wording is in the POSIX definition which only says
If address is a null address for the protocol, the socket’s peer
address shall be reset.
This is not the same but seems to be what Linux implements.
The problem is that I tried to reuse a socket which has been associated
with an IPv6 address to later connect to an IPv4 address. This is part
of the getaddrinfo implementation and an effort to make it more
efficient. strace's output looks like this:
connect(3, {sa_family=AF_INET6, sin6_port=htons(0), inet_pton(AF_INET6,
"2001:11b8:1:0:207:e94f:ee7c:4b72", &sin6_addr), sin6_flowinfo=0,
sin6_scope_id=0}, 28) = -1 ENETUNREACH (Network is unreachable)
connect(3, {sa_family=AF_UNSPEC,
sa_data="\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"}, 28) = 0
connect(3, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(0),
sin_addr=inet_addr("192.168.1.72")}, 16) = 0
I.e., despite what the man page says, the second connect only reset the
address, as required by the POSIX spec. It did not reset the address
family of the socket.
What I ideally would like to see is what the Linux man page says. I.e.,
if the .sa_family field is AF_UNSPEC all, the address and address
family, is reset. Otherwise only the address association itself is reset.
Is this functionality which got lost over time? Or is the man page
wrong and this never was the case? Is this a worthwhile change?
- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFG8M+52ijCOnn/RHQRAnTEAJ0Z/DrTkcCjpbybB5lqDad9Z0MbZwCeLZOh
u/mNfxV7uDjRsSuOj4YwuIg=
=FO70
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next reply other threads:[~2007-09-19 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-19 7:28 Ulrich Drepper [this message]
2007-09-19 15:04 ` drop association of connection-less socket Ulrich Drepper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46F0CFB9.30808@redhat.com \
--to=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).