From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] CAN: Add PF_CAN core module Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 13:43:12 +0200 Message-ID: <46F25CD0.7010702@trash.net> References: <20070917100321.18347.0@janus.isnogud.escape.de> <20070917100438.18347.2@janus.isnogud.escape.de> <46EFD33D.8030905@trash.net> <46F0DD8E.8070808@trash.net> <46F24C8D.2020804@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Miller , Thomas Gleixner , Oliver Hartkopp , Oliver Hartkopp To: Urs Thuermann Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:35650 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751272AbXITLug (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2007 07:50:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Urs Thuermann wrote: > I will post our updated code again, probably today. The issues still > left are > > * module parameter for loopback, but we want to keep that. No objections. > * configure option for allowing normal users access to raw and bcm CAN > sockets. I'll check how easily an (embedded) system can be set up > to run relevant/all processes with the CAP_NEW_RAW capability. I > would like to kill that configure option. Great. > * seq_files for proc fs. On my TODO list. Sounds good, thanks.