From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ulrich Drepper Subject: Re: bind and O_NONBLOCK Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 09:21:06 -0700 Message-ID: <46F540F2.1090109@redhat.com> References: <46F35DD9.4000909@redhat.com> <20070922161414.GA29637@2ka.mipt.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev , Alan Cox To: Evgeniy Polyakov Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:44864 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750871AbXIVQVX (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Sep 2007 12:21:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070922161414.GA29637@2ka.mipt.ru> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > So, did I understand you correctly, that you want to introduce networ= k > AIO here? (for example on behalf of work queue or something else?) See Alan's mail. All this was his proposal, I just got it accepted upstream. The problem to solve is if you have a distributed network port set. Apparently NetBIOS has it but I could also imagine this to be useful in cluster implementations which have to appear as one machine. In this case, before binding to a given port, you have to make sure no other machine already handles this port. - -- =E2=9E=A7 Ulrich Drepper =E2=9E=A7 Red Hat, Inc. =E2=9E=A7 444 Castro S= t =E2=9E=A7 Mountain View, CA =E2=9D=96 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG9UDy2ijCOnn/RHQRAvntAKC6F6Pz6zHd/iZLFECOZ0MxlhdPBQCgjrLC V9cazPF5jjf2eUSr7ZKDSas=3D =3D0v1W -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----