netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Satoshi OSHIMA <satoshi.oshima.fk@hitachi.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, haoki@redhat.com,
	???? <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
	"Yumiko SUGITA" <yumiko.sugita.yf@hitachi.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/3] UDP memory usage accounting: accounting unit and variable
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 22:24:43 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46FD009B.1010904@hitachi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <p734pho9nb9.fsf@bingen.suse.de>

Hi,

Thank you for your comment.

Andi Kleen wrote:
> Satoshi OSHIMA <satoshi.oshima.fk@hitachi.com> writes:
>
>> This patch introduces global variable for UDP memory accounting.
>> The unit is page.
>
> The global variable doesn't seem to be very MP scalable, especially
> if you change it for each packet. This will be a very hot cache line,
> in the worst case bouncing around a large machine.

I understand what you pointed out. But I think the accounting
method I'm proposing is very similar to TCP accounting and per
socket accounting.
How do you think of it?


> Possible alternatives:
> - Per CPU variables

I'm afraid that sockets and socket buffers are handled on
various CPUs. I mean that socket creation might be done
on CPU-A but socket receiving might be done on CPU-B.

And per CPU variables must be counted up when socket
cap is checked. I'm afraid that per CPU vaiables are
also costly enough.


> - You only change the global on socket creation time (by pre
allocating a large
> amount) or when the system comes under memory pressure.
> - Batching of the global updates for multiple packets [that's a variant
> of the previous one, might be still too costly though]
>
> Also for such variables it's usually good to cache line pad them on SMP
> to avoid false sharing with something else.

I believe that memory usage accounting should be done accurately.
Currently I couldn't see how can we know the accurate memory
accounting only when the system is under memory pressure.

But I revised the patch to avoid some atomic operations.

If I could find the good way to avoid atomic operation more,
I will add it.

Satoshi Oshima

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-09-28 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-21 12:26 [RFC/PATCH 2/3] UDP memory usage accounting: accounting unit and variable Satoshi OSHIMA
2007-09-21 13:10 ` Andi Kleen
2007-09-27 18:54   ` Hideo AOKI
2007-09-28 13:24   ` Satoshi OSHIMA [this message]
2007-09-29  3:22     ` Herbert Xu
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-09-28 13:40 Satoshi OSHIMA

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46FD009B.1010904@hitachi.com \
    --to=satoshi.oshima.fk@hitachi.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=haoki@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    --cc=yumiko.sugita.yf@hitachi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).