From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: razor@blackwall.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, joannelkoong@gmail.com,
memxor@gmail.com, toke@redhat.com, joe@cilium.io,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 02/10] bpf: Implement BPF link handling for tc BPF programs
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 13:10:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46cabc2c-fc7f-5699-dfcb-b8be686ed200@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221004231143.19190-3-daniel@iogearbox.net>
On 10/4/22 4:11 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> static int __xtc_prog_detach(struct net_device *dev, bool ingress, u32 limit,
> - u32 prio)
> + u32 id, u32 prio)
> {
> struct bpf_prog_array_item *item, *tmp;
> struct bpf_prog *oprog, *fprog = NULL;
> @@ -126,8 +133,11 @@ static int __xtc_prog_detach(struct net_device *dev, bool ingress, u32 limit,
> if (item->bpf_priority != prio) {
> tmp->prog = oprog;
> tmp->bpf_priority = item->bpf_priority;
> + tmp->bpf_id = item->bpf_id;
> j++;
> } else {
> + if (item->bpf_id != id)
> + return -EBUSY;
A nit. Should this be -ENOENT? I think the cgroup detach is also returning
-ENOENT for the not found case.
btw, this case should only happen from the BPF_PROG_DETACH but not the
BPF_LINK_DETACH?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-06 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-04 23:11 [PATCH bpf-next 00/10] BPF link support for tc BPF programs Daniel Borkmann
2022-10-04 23:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/10] bpf: Add initial fd-based API to attach " Daniel Borkmann
2022-10-05 0:55 ` sdf
2022-10-05 10:50 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-10-05 14:48 ` Daniel Borkmann
2022-10-05 12:35 ` Daniel Borkmann
2022-10-05 17:56 ` sdf
2022-10-05 18:21 ` Daniel Borkmann
2022-10-05 10:33 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-10-05 12:47 ` Daniel Borkmann
2022-10-05 14:32 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-10-05 14:53 ` Daniel Borkmann
2022-10-05 19:04 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2022-10-06 20:49 ` Daniel Borkmann
2022-10-07 15:36 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2022-10-06 0:22 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-10-06 5:00 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-10-06 14:40 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2022-10-06 23:29 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-10-07 15:43 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2022-10-06 21:29 ` Daniel Borkmann
2022-10-06 23:28 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-10-07 13:26 ` Daniel Borkmann
2022-10-07 14:32 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-10-07 16:55 ` sdf
2022-10-07 17:20 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-10-07 18:11 ` sdf
2022-10-07 19:06 ` Daniel Borkmann
2022-10-07 18:59 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-10-07 19:37 ` Daniel Borkmann
2022-10-07 22:45 ` sdf
2022-10-07 23:41 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-10-07 23:34 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-10-08 11:38 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-10-08 20:38 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-10-13 18:30 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-10-14 15:38 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-10-27 9:01 ` Daniel Xu
2022-10-06 20:15 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-10-06 20:54 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-10-04 23:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/10] bpf: Implement BPF link handling for " Daniel Borkmann
2022-10-06 3:19 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-10-06 20:54 ` Daniel Borkmann
2022-10-06 17:56 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-10-06 20:10 ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2022-10-04 23:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/10] bpf: Implement link update for tc BPF link programs Daniel Borkmann
2022-10-06 3:19 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-10-04 23:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/10] bpf: Implement link introspection " Daniel Borkmann
2022-10-06 3:19 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-10-06 23:14 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-10-04 23:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/10] bpf: Implement link detach " Daniel Borkmann
2022-10-06 3:19 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-10-06 23:24 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-10-04 23:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/10] libbpf: Change signature of bpf_prog_query Daniel Borkmann
2022-10-06 3:19 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-10-04 23:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/10] libbpf: Add extended attach/detach opts Daniel Borkmann
2022-10-06 3:19 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-10-04 23:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/10] libbpf: Add support for BPF tc link Daniel Borkmann
2022-10-06 3:19 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-10-04 23:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/10] bpftool: Add support for tc fd-based attach types Daniel Borkmann
2022-10-04 23:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/10] bpf, selftests: Add various BPF tc link selftests Daniel Borkmann
2022-10-06 3:19 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46cabc2c-fc7f-5699-dfcb-b8be686ed200@linux.dev \
--to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
--cc=joe@cilium.io \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).