From: John Heffner <jheffner@psc.edu>
To: lm@bitmover.com, Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, davem@davemloft.net,
wscott@bitmover.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tcp bw in 2.6
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 14:29:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47028DEF.5070009@psc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071002150935.GC17418@bitmover.com>
Larry McVoy wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 06:52:54PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
>>> One of my clients also has gigabit so I played around with just that
>>> one and it (itanium running hpux w/ broadcom gigabit) can push the load
>>> as well. One weird thing is that it is dependent on the direction the
>>> data is flowing. If the hp is sending then I get 46MB/sec, if linux is
>>> sending then I get 18MB/sec. Weird. Linux is debian, running
>> First of all check the CPU load on both sides to see if either
>> of them is saturating. If the CPU's fine then look at the tcpdump
>> output to see if both receivers are using the same window settings.
>
> tcpdump is a good idea, take a look at this. The window starts out
> at 46 and never opens up in my test case, but in the rsh case it
> starts out the same but does open up. Ideas?
(Binary tcpdumps are always better than ascii.)
The window on the sender (linux box) starts at 46. It doesn't open up,
but it's not receiving data so it doesn't matter, and you don't expect
it to. The HP box always announces a window of 32768.
Looks like you have TSO enabled. Does it behave differently if it's
disabled? I think Rick Jones is on to something with the HP ack
avoidance. Looks like a pretty low ack ratio, and it might not be
interacting well with TSO, especially at such a small window size.
-John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-02 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070929142517.EC6AB5FB21@work.bitmover.com>
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.0.999.0709290914410.3579@woody.linux-foundation.org>
[not found] ` <20070929172639.GB7037@bitmover.com>
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.0.999.0709291050200.3579@woody.linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-02 0:59 ` tcp bw in 2.6 Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 2:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-02 2:20 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 3:50 ` David Miller
2007-10-02 4:23 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 15:06 ` John Heffner
2007-10-02 17:14 ` Rick Jones
2007-10-02 17:20 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 18:01 ` Rick Jones
2007-10-02 18:40 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 19:47 ` Rick Jones
2007-10-02 21:32 ` David Miller
2007-10-03 7:19 ` Bill Fink
2007-10-02 10:52 ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-02 15:09 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 15:41 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 16:25 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 16:47 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-02 16:49 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 17:10 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-15 12:40 ` Daniel Schaffrath
2007-10-15 15:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-02 16:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-02 16:48 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 21:16 ` David Miller
2007-10-02 21:26 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 21:47 ` David Miller
2007-10-02 22:17 ` Rick Jones
2007-10-02 22:32 ` David Miller
2007-10-02 22:36 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 22:59 ` Rick Jones
2007-10-03 8:02 ` David Miller
2007-10-02 16:48 ` Ben Greear
2007-10-02 17:11 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 17:18 ` Ben Greear
2007-10-02 17:21 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 17:54 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-02 18:35 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 18:29 ` John Heffner [this message]
2007-10-02 19:07 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 19:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-02 20:31 ` David Miller
2007-10-02 19:33 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 19:53 ` John Heffner
2007-10-02 20:14 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 20:40 ` Rick Jones
2007-10-02 20:42 ` Wayne Scott
2007-10-02 21:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-02 19:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-02 19:53 ` Rick Jones
2007-10-02 20:33 ` David Miller
2007-10-02 20:44 ` Roland Dreier
2007-10-02 21:21 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-03 21:13 ` Pekka Pietikainen
2007-10-03 21:23 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-03 21:50 ` Pekka Pietikainen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47028DEF.5070009@psc.edu \
--to=jheffner@psc.edu \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=lm@bitmover.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wscott@bitmover.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).