From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: Fixed PHY regression Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:56:34 -0400 Message-ID: <470AC3B2.7090802@garzik.org> References: <008601c809d7$7f5dc710$04ac10ac@Jocke> <20071008.142057.31775797.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: joakim.tjernlund@transmode.se, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:55196 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752204AbXJHX4q (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Oct 2007 19:56:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20071008.142057.31775797.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org David Miller wrote: > From: "Joakim Tjernlund" > Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 20:17:33 +0200 > >> David, any chance the second item, Oops while modprobing phy fixed module, in >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119178673421891&w=2 >> will make it into 2.6.23? >> >> The fix is now in your tree, >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/davem/bak-net-2.6.24.git;a=commit;h=bbb4c0c35a4c2aed5e025b668c8dfc99c5b74cff >> >> It has been in Andrews tree for a while, then in Garzik and now it is in your tree. > > Jeff, any reason you didn't submit this one for 2.6.23? Two reasons: * despite the subject, after discussion it looked like a problem with module release, making "build it into your kernel" a valid workaround * the fix was quite invasive this late in the game If people still think it should go for 2.6.23, that's cool with me. Jeff