From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
devel@openvz.org
Subject: [PATCH 8/9] Small cleanup for xxx_put after evictor consolidation
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:27:40 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <470F764C.2070305@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <470F6EAE.60308@openvz.org>
After the evictor code is consolidated there is no need in
passing the extra pointer to the xxx_put() functions.
The only place when it made sense was the evictor code itself.
Maybe this change must got with the previous (or with the
next) patch, but I try to make them shorter as much as
possible to simplify the review (but they are still large
anyway), so this change goes in a separate patch.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
---
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c b/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
index a59ac39..4ea7948 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
@@ -152,10 +152,10 @@ static __inline__ struct ipq *frag_alloc_queue(void)
/* Destruction primitives. */
-static __inline__ void ipq_put(struct ipq *ipq, int *work)
+static __inline__ void ipq_put(struct ipq *ipq)
{
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&ipq->q.refcnt))
- inet_frag_destroy(&ipq->q, &ip4_frags, work);
+ inet_frag_destroy(&ipq->q, &ip4_frags, NULL);
}
/* Kill ipq entry. It is not destroyed immediately,
@@ -227,7 +205,7 @@ static void ip_expire(unsigned long arg)
}
out:
spin_unlock(&qp->q.lock);
- ipq_put(qp, NULL);
+ ipq_put(qp);
}
/* Creation primitives. */
@@ -257,7 +235,7 @@ static struct ipq *ip_frag_intern(struct ipq *qp_in)
atomic_inc(&qp->q.refcnt);
write_unlock(&ip4_frags.lock);
qp_in->q.last_in |= COMPLETE;
- ipq_put(qp_in, NULL);
+ ipq_put(qp_in);
return qp;
}
}
@@ -652,7 +630,7 @@ struct sk_buff *ip_defrag(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 user)
ret = ip_frag_reasm(qp, dev);
spin_unlock(&qp->q.lock);
- ipq_put(qp, NULL);
+ ipq_put(qp);
return ret;
}
diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c
index 785f5cd..862d089 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c
@@ -147,10 +147,10 @@ static inline struct nf_ct_frag6_queue *frag_alloc_queue(void)
/* Destruction primitives. */
-static __inline__ void fq_put(struct nf_ct_frag6_queue *fq, unsigned int *work)
+static __inline__ void fq_put(struct nf_ct_frag6_queue *fq)
{
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&fq->q.refcnt))
- inet_frag_destroy(&fq->q, &nf_frags, work);
+ inet_frag_destroy(&fq->q, &nf_frags, NULL);
}
/* Kill fq entry. It is not destroyed immediately,
@@ -206,7 +179,7 @@ static void nf_ct_frag6_expire(unsigned long data)
out:
spin_unlock(&fq->q.lock);
- fq_put(fq, NULL);
+ fq_put(fq);
}
/* Creation primitives. */
@@ -228,7 +201,7 @@ static struct nf_ct_frag6_queue *nf_ct_frag6_intern(unsigned int hash,
atomic_inc(&fq->q.refcnt);
write_unlock(&nf_frags.lock);
fq_in->q.last_in |= COMPLETE;
- fq_put(fq_in, NULL);
+ fq_put(fq_in);
return fq;
}
}
@@ -719,7 +692,7 @@ struct sk_buff *nf_ct_frag6_gather(struct sk_buff *skb)
if (nf_ct_frag6_queue(fq, clone, fhdr, nhoff) < 0) {
spin_unlock(&fq->q.lock);
pr_debug("Can't insert skb to queue\n");
- fq_put(fq, NULL);
+ fq_put(fq);
goto ret_orig;
}
@@ -730,7 +703,7 @@ struct sk_buff *nf_ct_frag6_gather(struct sk_buff *skb)
}
spin_unlock(&fq->q.lock);
- fq_put(fq, NULL);
+ fq_put(fq);
return ret_skb;
ret_orig:
diff --git a/net/ipv6/reassembly.c b/net/ipv6/reassembly.c
index 74b2113..454db16 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/reassembly.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/reassembly.c
@@ -165,10 +165,10 @@ static inline struct frag_queue *frag_alloc_queue(void)
/* Destruction primitives. */
-static __inline__ void fq_put(struct frag_queue *fq, int *work)
+static __inline__ void fq_put(struct frag_queue *fq)
{
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&fq->q.refcnt))
- inet_frag_destroy(&fq->q, &ip6_frags, work);
+ inet_frag_destroy(&fq->q, &ip6_frags, NULL);
}
/* Kill fq entry. It is not destroyed immediately,
@@ -246,7 +224,7 @@ out:
if (dev)
dev_put(dev);
spin_unlock(&fq->q.lock);
- fq_put(fq, NULL);
+ fq_put(fq);
}
/* Creation primitives. */
@@ -270,7 +248,7 @@ static struct frag_queue *ip6_frag_intern(struct frag_queue *fq_in)
atomic_inc(&fq->q.refcnt);
write_unlock(&ip6_frags.lock);
fq_in->q.last_in |= COMPLETE;
- fq_put(fq_in, NULL);
+ fq_put(fq_in);
return fq;
}
}
@@ -676,7 +654,7 @@ static int ipv6_frag_rcv(struct sk_buff **skbp)
ret = ip6_frag_reasm(fq, skbp, dev);
spin_unlock(&fq->q.lock);
- fq_put(fq, NULL);
+ fq_put(fq);
return ret;
}
--
1.5.3.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-12 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-12 12:55 [PATCH 0/9] Consolidate IP fragment management Pavel Emelyanov
2007-10-12 13:00 ` [PATCH 1/9] Move common fields from frag_queues in one place Pavel Emelyanov
2007-10-15 9:24 ` David Miller
2007-10-12 13:06 ` [PATCH 2/9] Collect frag queues management objects together Pavel Emelyanov
2007-10-15 9:32 ` David Miller
2007-10-12 13:10 ` [PATCH 3/9] Collect common sysctl variables together Pavel Emelyanov
2007-10-15 9:33 ` David Miller
2007-10-12 13:12 ` [PATCH 4/9] Consolidate the xxx_frag_kill Pavel Emelyanov
2007-10-15 9:37 ` David Miller
2007-10-12 13:16 ` [PATCH 5/9] Consolidate xxx_the secret_rebuild Pavel Emelyanov
2007-10-15 9:38 ` David Miller
2007-10-12 13:21 ` [PATCH 6/9] Consolidate the xxx_frag_destroy Pavel Emelyanov
2007-10-15 9:39 ` David Miller
2007-10-12 13:24 ` [PATCH 7/9] Consolidate the xxx_evictor Pavel Emelyanov
2007-10-15 9:40 ` David Miller
2007-10-12 13:27 ` Pavel Emelyanov [this message]
2007-10-15 9:41 ` [PATCH 8/9] Small cleanup for xxx_put after evictor consolidation David Miller
2007-10-12 13:29 ` [PATCH 9/9] Consolidate the xxx_put Pavel Emelyanov
2007-10-15 9:42 ` David Miller
2007-10-15 9:42 ` [PATCH 0/9] Consolidate IP fragment management David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=470F764C.2070305@openvz.org \
--to=xemul@openvz.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).