From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [RFD] iptables: mangle table obsoletes filter table Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:03:25 +0200 Message-ID: <470F7EAD.5050605@trash.net> References: <200710120031.42805.a1426z@gawab.com> <200710121630.29151.a1426z@gawab.com> <470F7B4B.2010609@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Al Boldi , Netfilter Developer Mailing List , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:59363 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753609AbXJLOED (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Oct 2007 10:04:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Oct 12 2007 15:48, Patrick McHardy wrote: > >>The netlink based iptables successor I'm currently working on allows to >>dynamically create tables with user-specified priorities and "built-in" >>chains. The only built-in tables will be those that need extra >>processing (mangle/nat). So it should be possible to set up tables >>basically any way you desire. > > > Will ebtables move a bit closer to iptables? I didn't get to that part yet, but yes, thats one of the goals.