From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, devel@openvz.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] Omit double hash calculations in xxx_frag_intern
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:48:46 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4714C13E.3040808@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4714C0AF.1000209@openvz.org>
Since the hash value is already calculated in xxx_find, we can
simply use it later. This is already done in netfilter code,
so make the same in ipv4 and ipv6.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
---
>From 5bcb464538cf504a9f6cf3be33dbd1a5ff18b693 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pavel <pavel@xemulnb.sw.ru>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:40:30 +0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] Pass the hash value as an extra argument
---
net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c | 11 ++++-------
net/ipv6/reassembly.c | 11 +++++------
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c b/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
index 443b3f8..d12a18b 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
@@ -212,17 +212,14 @@ out:
/* Creation primitives. */
-static struct ipq *ip_frag_intern(struct ipq *qp_in)
+static struct ipq *ip_frag_intern(struct ipq *qp_in, unsigned int hash)
{
struct ipq *qp;
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
struct hlist_node *n;
#endif
- unsigned int hash;
write_lock(&ip4_frags.lock);
- hash = ipqhashfn(qp_in->id, qp_in->saddr, qp_in->daddr,
- qp_in->protocol);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/* With SMP race we have to recheck hash table, because
* such entry could be created on other cpu, while we
@@ -257,7 +254,7 @@ static struct ipq *ip_frag_intern(struct ipq *qp_in)
}
/* Add an entry to the 'ipq' queue for a newly received IP datagram. */
-static struct ipq *ip_frag_create(struct iphdr *iph, u32 user)
+static struct ipq *ip_frag_create(struct iphdr *iph, u32 user, unsigned int h)
{
struct ipq *qp;
@@ -278,7 +275,7 @@ static struct ipq *ip_frag_create(struct iphdr *iph, u32 user)
spin_lock_init(&qp->q.lock);
atomic_set(&qp->q.refcnt, 1);
- return ip_frag_intern(qp);
+ return ip_frag_intern(qp, h);
out_nomem:
LIMIT_NETDEBUG(KERN_ERR "ip_frag_create: no memory left !\n");
@@ -313,7 +310,7 @@ static inline struct ipq *ip_find(struct iphdr *iph, u32 user)
}
read_unlock(&ip4_frags.lock);
- return ip_frag_create(iph, user);
+ return ip_frag_create(iph, user, hash);
}
/* Is the fragment too far ahead to be part of ipq? */
diff --git a/net/ipv6/reassembly.c b/net/ipv6/reassembly.c
index 6ad19cf..0a1bf43 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/reassembly.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/reassembly.c
@@ -233,16 +233,15 @@ out:
/* Creation primitives. */
-static struct frag_queue *ip6_frag_intern(struct frag_queue *fq_in)
+static struct frag_queue *ip6_frag_intern(struct frag_queue *fq_in,
+ unsigned int hash)
{
struct frag_queue *fq;
- unsigned int hash;
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
struct hlist_node *n;
#endif
write_lock(&ip6_frags.lock);
- hash = ip6qhashfn(fq_in->id, &fq_in->saddr, &fq_in->daddr);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
hlist_for_each_entry(fq, n, &ip6_frags.hash[hash], q.list) {
if (fq->id == fq_in->id &&
@@ -273,7 +272,7 @@ static struct frag_queue *ip6_frag_intern(struct frag_queue *fq_in)
static struct frag_queue *
ip6_frag_create(__be32 id, struct in6_addr *src, struct in6_addr *dst,
- struct inet6_dev *idev)
+ struct inet6_dev *idev, unsigned int hash)
{
struct frag_queue *fq;
@@ -290,7 +289,7 @@ ip6_frag_create(__be32 id, struct in6_addr *src, struct in6_addr *dst,
spin_lock_init(&fq->q.lock);
atomic_set(&fq->q.refcnt, 1);
- return ip6_frag_intern(fq);
+ return ip6_frag_intern(fq, hash);
oom:
IP6_INC_STATS_BH(idev, IPSTATS_MIB_REASMFAILS);
@@ -318,7 +317,7 @@ fq_find(__be32 id, struct in6_addr *src, struct in6_addr *dst,
}
read_unlock(&ip6_frags.lock);
- return ip6_frag_create(id, src, dst, idev);
+ return ip6_frag_create(id, src, dst, idev, hash);
}
--
1.5.3.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-16 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-16 13:46 [PATCH 0/7] Next step in consolidating the IP fragment management Pavel Emelyanov
2007-10-16 13:48 ` Pavel Emelyanov [this message]
2007-10-18 2:44 ` [PATCH 1/7] Omit double hash calculations in xxx_frag_intern David Miller
2007-10-16 13:53 ` [PATCH 2/7] Consolidate xxx_frag_intern Pavel Emelyanov
2007-10-18 2:44 ` David Miller
2007-10-16 13:57 ` [PATCH 3/7] Consolidate xxx_frag_alloc() Pavel Emelyanov
2007-10-18 2:45 ` David Miller
2007-10-16 14:00 ` [PATCH 4/7] Consolidate xxx_frag_create() Pavel Emelyanov
2007-10-18 2:46 ` David Miller
2007-10-16 14:03 ` [PATCH 5/7] Consolidate xxx_find() in fragment management Pavel Emelyanov
2007-10-18 2:47 ` David Miller
2007-10-16 14:05 ` [PATCH 6/7] Remove no longer needed ->equal callback Pavel Emelyanov
2007-10-18 2:48 ` David Miller
2007-10-16 14:07 ` [PATCH 7/7] Consolidate frag queues freeing Pavel Emelyanov
2007-10-18 2:48 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4714C13E.3040808@openvz.org \
--to=xemul@openvz.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).