From: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: David Mack <dmack@juniper.net>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, esandeen@redhat.com
Subject: Re: e100 problems in .23rc8 ?
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 10:59:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47179F1F.3030202@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7DCDA0F058071B49AED9D3D7886C41BE0966AEDB@muon.jnpr.net>
David Mack wrote:
> It appears that the needed e100 fix made it into the Fedora
> 2.6.23.1-23.fc8 kernel. Boots reliably now.
>
> Huge thanks and great work, guys.
DaveJ, I didn't push anything upstream. Can you verify this now works?
Auke
>
> Dave
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kok, Auke [mailto:auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com]
>> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 10:05 AM
>> To: Herbert Xu
>> Cc: David Mack; Dave Jones; netdev@vger.kernel.org;
>> esandeen@redhat.com
>> Subject: Re: e100 problems in .23rc8 ?
>>
>> Herbert Xu wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 07:54:33AM -0700, David Mack wrote:
>>>> Still no joy here. See attached capture. What's really
>> weird is that it
>>>> shows *two* kernel panics, one in e100_poll and one in _list_add.
>>> Yes that's the symptom one would expect from that bug. We really
>>> need to apply the same fix that was done for e1000.
>> I feared that. its not the same as that commit that floated
>> around in this thread
>> and involves some reorganization in the init/probe code, so
>> it's a bit more
>> involved than just a few lines. I'll need a little bit of
>> time to generate this fix.
>>
>> Auke
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-18 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-26 15:04 e100 problems in .23rc8 ? Dave Jones
2007-09-26 18:10 ` Kok, Auke
2007-09-26 18:18 ` Dave Jones
2007-09-27 6:58 ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-11 0:36 ` Dave Jones
2007-10-11 1:25 ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-11 16:10 ` Kok, Auke
2007-10-11 17:25 ` Dave Jones
2007-10-11 18:56 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-10-12 14:54 ` David Mack
2007-10-12 15:35 ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-12 15:51 ` David Mack
2007-10-13 2:35 ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-16 14:33 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-10-16 14:35 ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-16 15:47 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-10-16 16:39 ` David Mack
2007-10-12 17:04 ` Kok, Auke
2007-10-18 17:51 ` David Mack
2007-10-18 17:59 ` Kok, Auke [this message]
2007-10-18 18:17 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-10-22 1:04 ` Dave Jones
2007-10-22 3:10 ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-22 14:05 ` David Mack
2007-10-22 14:59 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-10-22 14:44 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-10-11 23:24 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47179F1F.3030202@intel.com \
--to=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=dmack@juniper.net \
--cc=esandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).