From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Kok, Auke" Subject: Re: e100 problems in .23rc8 ? Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 10:59:59 -0700 Message-ID: <47179F1F.3030202@intel.com> References: <7DCDA0F058071B49AED9D3D7886C41BE0966AEDB@muon.jnpr.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Mack , Herbert Xu , netdev@vger.kernel.org, esandeen@redhat.com To: Dave Jones Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:48262 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757117AbXJRSAX (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:00:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <7DCDA0F058071B49AED9D3D7886C41BE0966AEDB@muon.jnpr.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org David Mack wrote: > It appears that the needed e100 fix made it into the Fedora > 2.6.23.1-23.fc8 kernel. Boots reliably now. > > Huge thanks and great work, guys. DaveJ, I didn't push anything upstream. Can you verify this now works? Auke > > Dave > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Kok, Auke [mailto:auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com] >> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 10:05 AM >> To: Herbert Xu >> Cc: David Mack; Dave Jones; netdev@vger.kernel.org; >> esandeen@redhat.com >> Subject: Re: e100 problems in .23rc8 ? >> >> Herbert Xu wrote: >>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 07:54:33AM -0700, David Mack wrote: >>>> Still no joy here. See attached capture. What's really >> weird is that it >>>> shows *two* kernel panics, one in e100_poll and one in _list_add. >>> Yes that's the symptom one would expect from that bug. We really >>> need to apply the same fix that was done for e1000. >> I feared that. its not the same as that commit that floated >> around in this thread >> and involves some reorganization in the init/probe code, so >> it's a bit more >> involved than just a few lines. I'll need a little bit of >> time to generate this fix. >> >> Auke >>