From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: e100 problems in .23rc8 ?
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:17:18 -0400
Message-ID: <4717A32E.1070708@redhat.com>
References: <7DCDA0F058071B49AED9D3D7886C41BE0966AEDB@muon.jnpr.net> <47179F1F.3030202@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, David Mack <dmack@juniper.net>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, esandeen@redhat.com
To: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:51150 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1758306AbXJRSRb (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:17:31 -0400
In-Reply-To: <47179F1F.3030202@intel.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On 10/18/2007 01:59 PM, Kok, Auke wrote:
> David Mack wrote:
>> It appears that the needed e100 fix made it into the Fedora
>> 2.6.23.1-23.fc8 kernel. Boots reliably now.
>>
>> Huge thanks and great work, guys.
> 
> 
> DaveJ, I didn't push anything upstream. Can you verify this now works?
> 

We didn't put anything in Fedora recently...