From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] FEC - fast ethernet controller for mpc52xx Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:14:35 -0400 Message-ID: <4717B09B.3060800@pobox.com> References: <20071014075511.GC3000@nd47.coderock.org> <4713BA1C.2050604@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Domen Puncer , galak@kernel.crashing.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, tnt@246tnt.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Grant Likely Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:58112 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758866AbXJRTOn (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:14:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Grant Likely wrote: > On 10/15/07, Jeff Garzik wrote: >> Domen Puncer wrote: >>> Hello! >>> >>> If there are no objections, I would like to get this merged >>> when bestcomm goes in (any time now?). >>> >>> It's split into four parts: >>> 1 - device tree >>> 2 - small bestcomm change >>> 3 - the actual driver >>> 4 - phy part of the driver >> patches #3 and #4 need to be combined together. >> >> Are the arch people OK with patches #1 and #2? > > Jeff, > > The bestcomm patches and patch 1 & 2 from this series are now in > Linus' tree. That clears the way for the FEC driver when Domen > reposts it. (In other words; there is nothing left in arch land > blocking this driver) > except a resend combining patches 3 and 4 as requested :)