From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Convert bonding timers to workqueues Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:34:48 -0400 Message-ID: <471CED48.207@garzik.org> References: <11920760494096-git-send-email-fubar@us.ibm.com> <11920760502756-git-send-email-fubar@us.ibm.com> <4713B44E.7030902@pobox.com> <20038.1192475339@death> <170fa0d20710220755w744e8ec8w1d85cae4f4be822e@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, andy@greyhouse.net To: Mike Snitzer , Jay Vosburgh Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:38117 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752023AbXJVSez (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:34:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <170fa0d20710220755w744e8ec8w1d85cae4f4be822e@mail.gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Mike Snitzer wrote: > Given that Jay rebased and posted updated bonding locking patches on > Oct 17 will you be pushing them for inclusion in 2.6.24-rc1? or > 2.6.24-rcX? I don't see them queued in your netdev-2.6 tree. These > bonding locking issues have been a problem for some time and it would > be very good to get them fixed upstream sooner rather than later. I wasn't aware this brand-new code is a bug fix? Normally brand new code needs to be posted and reviewed and committed to a tree -before- the merge window opens. Jeff