From: Valentine Barshak <vbarshak@ru.mvista.com>
To: Ingo Oeser <netdev@axxeo.de>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>,
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: net: Fix asix read transfer buffer allocations.
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:20:18 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <471E2D52.5060404@ru.mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200710231900.14696.netdev@axxeo.de>
Ingo Oeser wrote:
> Valentine Barshak schrieb:
>> Oliver Neukum wrote:
>>> Am Montag 22 Oktober 2007 schrieb Valentine Barshak:
>>>> static int asix_mdio_read(struct net_device *netdev, int phy_id, int loc)
>>>> {
>>>> struct usbnet *dev = netdev_priv(netdev);
>>>> + void *buf;
>>>> u16 res;
>>>>
>>>> mutex_lock(&dev->phy_mutex);
>>>> asix_set_sw_mii(dev);
>>>> +
>>>> + buf = kmalloc(2, GFP_KERNEL);
>>> This is done under lock. Can you allocate the buffer once and reuse it?
>> I think we can use 2 bytes of the usbnet data buffer for this.
>> I'll submit a new patch soon.
>
> If this cannot be done for some reason, then you can at least kmalloc() before
> you do "mutex_lock(&dev->phy_mutex);" and kfree() after you did
> "mutex_unlock(&dev->phy_mutex);"
>
> The reason to can do this, is that "buf" has a life time limited to this function.
>
> The reason you should do this, is that kmalloc(, GFP_KERNEL) is allowed to sleep,
> which will block the mutex for that time. While this is technically ok,
> since mutexes can sleep, it is not desireable, since other users of that mutex
> are blocked until the allocation is done.
>
> If you are able to implement the "2 bytes of usbnet data buffer" version,
> please ignore that mail :-)
>
>
> Best Regards
>
> Ingo Oeser
Looks like we cannot use usbnet data buffer for read transfers either,
because it's just a part of the usbnet structure and we may still lose
data while invalidating cache the same way we do using buffers on stack.
Allocating a permanent buffer for phy transfer needs more driver
changes: we should add unbind finction to the device_info for all asix
devices to deallocate the buffer at exit.
And we still need to allocate buffers for other transfers dynamically,
so having just one permanent buffer for phy doesn't help much.
I've reworked the original patch a bit: moved kmalloc out of the
phy_mutex and added more clean-ups.
Will submit shortly.
Thanks,
Valentine.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-23 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-22 15:50 [PATCH] USB: net: Fix asix read transfer buffer allocations Valentine Barshak
2007-10-22 17:29 ` Oliver Neukum
2007-10-22 19:22 ` Valentine Barshak
2007-10-23 17:00 ` Ingo Oeser
2007-10-23 17:20 ` Valentine Barshak [this message]
2007-10-23 17:40 ` Valentine Barshak
2007-10-23 20:00 ` David Brownell
2007-10-24 11:24 ` Valentine Barshak
2007-10-24 11:33 ` Valentine Barshak
2007-10-24 11:33 ` Valentine Barshak
2007-10-24 11:59 ` David Hollis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=471E2D52.5060404@ru.mvista.com \
--to=vbarshak@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=netdev@axxeo.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver@neukum.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).