Rick Jones wrote:
> The likelihood of one of these being used on an ia64 box is epsilon
> but it would still be nice to get rid of the warning:
> 
>  #warning Processor architecture undefined! 
> 
> when compiling on same. So, pick some likely similar architectures
> and follow those leads. Compile tested only.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
> 
> ---
> diff -r 35e54d4beaad drivers/net/fealnx.c
> --- a/drivers/net/fealnx.c	Wed Oct 24 05:06:40 2007 +0000
> +++ b/drivers/net/fealnx.c	Fri Oct 26 06:12:00 2007 -0700
> @@ -866,7 +866,7 @@ static int netdev_open(struct net_device
>  //   np->bcrvalue=0x04 | 0x0x38;  /* big-endian, 256 burst length */
>  	np->bcrvalue = 0x04 | 0x10;	/* big-endian, tx 8 burst length */
>  	np->crvalue = 0xe00;	/* rx 128 burst length */
> -#elif defined(__alpha__) || defined(__x86_64__)
> +#elif defined(__alpha__) || defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__ia64__)
>  // 89/9/1 modify,
>  //   np->bcrvalue=0x38;           /* little-endian, 256 burst length */
>  	np->bcrvalue = 0x10;	/* little-endian, 8 burst length */

Overall that poor driver is more than a little bit ugly :)

Looking at the large chain of highly-similar values, I would tend to 
prefer the attached patch...

	Jeff