From: Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] core: fix free_netdev when register fails during notification call chain
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:20:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4727057A.4050605@fr.ibm.com> (raw)
Point 1:
The unregistering of a network device schedule a netdev_run_todo.
This function calls dev->destructor when it is set and the
destructor calls free_netdev.
Point 2:
In the case of an initialization of a network device the usual code
is:
* alloc_netdev
* register_netdev
-> if this one fails, call free_netdev and exit with error.
Point 3:
In the register_netdevice function at the later state, when the device
is at the registered state, a call to the netdevice_notifiers is made.
If one of the notification falls into an error, a rollback to the
registered state is done using unregister_netdevice.
Conclusion:
When a network device fails to register during initialization because
one network subsystem returned an error during a notification call
chain, the network device is freed twice because of fact 1 and fact 2.
The second free_netdev will be done with an invalid pointer.
Proposed solution:
The following patch move all the code of unregister_netdevice *except*
the call to net_set_todo, to a new function "rollback_registered".
The following functions are changed in this way:
* register_netdevice: calls rollback_registered when a notification fails
* unregister_netdevice: calls rollback_register + net_set_todo, the call
order to net_set_todo is changed because it is the
latest now. Since it justs add an element to a
list
that should not break anything.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com>
---
net/core/dev.c | 112
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
Index: net-2.6/net/core/dev.c
===================================================================
--- net-2.6.orig/net/core/dev.c
+++ net-2.6/net/core/dev.c
@@ -3496,6 +3496,60 @@ static void net_set_todo(struct net_devi
spin_unlock(&net_todo_list_lock);
}
+static void rollback_registered(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ BUG_ON(dev_boot_phase);
+ ASSERT_RTNL();
+
+ /* Some devices call without registering for initialization unwind. */
+ if (dev->reg_state == NETREG_UNINITIALIZED) {
+ printk(KERN_DEBUG "unregister_netdevice: device %s/%p never "
+ "was registered\n", dev->name, dev);
+
+ WARN_ON(1);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ BUG_ON(dev->reg_state != NETREG_REGISTERED);
+
+ /* If device is running, close it first. */
+ dev_close(dev);
+
+ /* And unlink it from device chain. */
+ unlist_netdevice(dev);
+
+ dev->reg_state = NETREG_UNREGISTERING;
+
+ synchronize_net();
+
+ /* Shutdown queueing discipline. */
+ dev_shutdown(dev);
+
+
+ /* Notify protocols, that we are about to destroy
+ this device. They should clean all the things.
+ */
+ call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_UNREGISTER, dev);
+
+ /*
+ * Flush the unicast and multicast chains
+ */
+ dev_addr_discard(dev);
+
+ if (dev->uninit)
+ dev->uninit(dev);
+
+ /* Notifier chain MUST detach us from master device. */
+ BUG_TRAP(!dev->master);
+
+ /* Remove entries from kobject tree */
+ netdev_unregister_kobject(dev);
+
+ synchronize_net();
+
+ dev_put(dev);
+}
+
/**
* register_netdevice - register a network device
* @dev: device to register
@@ -3633,8 +3687,10 @@ int register_netdevice(struct net_device
/* Notify protocols, that a new device appeared. */
ret = call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_REGISTER, dev);
ret = notifier_to_errno(ret);
- if (ret)
- unregister_netdevice(dev);
+ if (ret) {
+ rollback_registered(dev);
+ dev->reg_state = NETREG_UNREGISTERED;
+ }
out:
return ret;
@@ -3911,59 +3967,9 @@ void synchronize_net(void)
void unregister_netdevice(struct net_device *dev)
{
- BUG_ON(dev_boot_phase);
- ASSERT_RTNL();
-
- /* Some devices call without registering for initialization unwind. */
- if (dev->reg_state == NETREG_UNINITIALIZED) {
- printk(KERN_DEBUG "unregister_netdevice: device %s/%p never "
- "was registered\n", dev->name, dev);
-
- WARN_ON(1);
- return;
- }
-
- BUG_ON(dev->reg_state != NETREG_REGISTERED);
-
- /* If device is running, close it first. */
- dev_close(dev);
-
- /* And unlink it from device chain. */
- unlist_netdevice(dev);
-
- dev->reg_state = NETREG_UNREGISTERING;
-
- synchronize_net();
-
- /* Shutdown queueing discipline. */
- dev_shutdown(dev);
-
-
- /* Notify protocols, that we are about to destroy
- this device. They should clean all the things.
- */
- call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_UNREGISTER, dev);
-
- /*
- * Flush the unicast and multicast chains
- */
- dev_addr_discard(dev);
-
- if (dev->uninit)
- dev->uninit(dev);
-
- /* Notifier chain MUST detach us from master device. */
- BUG_TRAP(!dev->master);
-
- /* Remove entries from kobject tree */
- netdev_unregister_kobject(dev);
-
+ rollback_registered(dev);
/* Finish processing unregister after unlock */
net_set_todo(dev);
-
- synchronize_net();
-
- dev_put(dev);
}
/**
reply other threads:[~2007-10-30 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4727057A.4050605@fr.ibm.com \
--to=dlezcano@fr.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).