From: Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, containers@lists.osdl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/1][NETNS] resend: fix net released by rcu callback
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:43:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4727A57E.501@fr.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1odegl47t.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com> writes:
>
>> When a network namespace reference is held by a network subsystem,
>> and when this reference is decremented in a rcu update callback, we
>> must ensure that there is no more outstanding rcu update before
>> trying to free the network namespace.
>>
>> In the normal case, the rcu_barrier is called when the network namespace
>> is exiting in the cleanup_net function.
>>
>> But when a network namespace creation fails, and the subsystems are
>> undone (like the cleanup), the rcu_barrier is missing.
>>
>> This patch adds the missing rcu_barrier.
>
> Looks sane. Did you have any specific failures related to this or was
> this something that was just caught in review?
Yes, I had this problem when doing ipv6 isolation for netns49. The ipv6
subsystem creation failed and the different subsystem where rollbacked
in the setup_net function.
When the network namespace was about to be freed in free_net function, I
had the error with an usage refcount different from zero.
It appears that was coming from core/neighbour.c
neigh_parms_release
-> neigh_rcu_free_parms
-> neigh_parms_put
-> neigh_parms_destroy
-> release_net
The free_net function was called before rcu callback neigh_rcu_free_parms.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-30 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20071030162139.954791193@mai.toulouse-stg.fr.ibm.com>
2007-10-30 16:21 ` [patch 1/1][NETNS] resend: fix net released by rcu callback Daniel Lezcano
2007-10-30 20:47 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-10-30 21:43 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2007-10-30 22:34 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-10-30 22:39 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4727A57E.501@fr.ibm.com \
--to=dlezcano@fr.ibm.com \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).