netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, devel@openvz.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/8] Move some core sock setup into sk_prot_alloc
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:51:51 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47288877.10803@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <472885B1.7090103@openvz.org>

The security_sk_alloc() and the module_get is a part of the
object allocations - move it in the proper place.

Note, that since we do not reset the newly allocated sock
in the sk_alloc() (memset() is removed with the previous
patch) we can safely do this.

Also fix the error path in sk_prot_alloc() - release the security
context if needed.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>

---

diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 21fc79b..e7537e4 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -870,7 +870,8 @@ static void sock_copy(struct sock *nsk, const struct sock *osk)
 #endif
 }
 
-static struct sock *sk_prot_alloc(struct proto *prot, gfp_t priority)
+static struct sock *sk_prot_alloc(struct proto *prot, gfp_t priority,
+		int family)
 {
 	struct sock *sk;
 	struct kmem_cache *slab;
@@ -881,18 +882,40 @@ static struct sock *sk_prot_alloc(struct proto *prot, gfp_t priority)
 	else
 		sk = kmalloc(prot->obj_size, priority);
 
+	if (sk != NULL) {
+		if (security_sk_alloc(sk, family, priority))
+			goto out_free;
+
+		if (!try_module_get(prot->owner))
+			goto out_free_sec;
+	}
+
 	return sk;
+
+out_free_sec:
+	security_sk_free(sk);
+out_free:
+	if (slab != NULL)
+		kmem_cache_free(slab, sk);
+	else
+		kfree(sk);
+	return NULL;
 }
 
 static void sk_prot_free(struct proto *prot, struct sock *sk)
 {
 	struct kmem_cache *slab;
-
+	struct module *owner;
+
+	owner = prot->owner;
 	slab = prot->slab;
+
+	security_sk_free(sk);
 	if (slab != NULL)
 		kmem_cache_free(slab, sk);
 	else
 		kfree(sk);
+	module_put(owner);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -911,7 +934,7 @@ struct sock *sk_alloc(struct net *net, int family, gfp_t priority,
 	if (zero_it)
 		priority |= __GFP_ZERO;
 
-	sk = sk_prot_alloc(prot, priority);
+	sk = sk_prot_alloc(prot, priority, family);
 	if (sk) {
 		if (zero_it) {
 			sk->sk_family = family;
@@ -923,24 +946,14 @@ struct sock *sk_alloc(struct net *net, int family, gfp_t priority,
 			sock_lock_init(sk);
 			sk->sk_net = get_net(net);
 		}
-
-		if (security_sk_alloc(sk, family, priority))
-			goto out_free;
-
-		if (!try_module_get(prot->owner))
-			goto out_free;
 	}
-	return sk;
 
-out_free:
-	sk_prot_free(prot, sk);
-	return NULL;
+	return sk;
 }
 
 void sk_free(struct sock *sk)
 {
 	struct sk_filter *filter;
-	struct module *owner = sk->sk_prot_creator->owner;
 
 	if (sk->sk_destruct)
 		sk->sk_destruct(sk);
@@ -957,10 +970,8 @@ void sk_free(struct sock *sk)
 		printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: optmem leakage (%d bytes) detected.\n",
 		       __FUNCTION__, atomic_read(&sk->sk_omem_alloc));
 
-	security_sk_free(sk);
 	put_net(sk->sk_net);
 	sk_prot_free(sk->sk_prot_creator, sk);
-	module_put(owner);
 }
 
 struct sock *sk_clone(const struct sock *sk, const gfp_t priority)
-- 
1.5.3.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-10-31 12:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-31 13:40 [PATCH 0/8] Cleanup/fix the sk_alloc() call Pavel Emelyanov
2007-10-31 13:15 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2007-10-31 14:32   ` Pavel Emelyanov
2007-10-31 14:14     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2007-10-31 13:42 ` [PATCH 1/8] Move the sock_copy() from the header Pavel Emelyanov
2007-11-01  7:30   ` David Miller
2007-10-31 13:44 ` [PATCH 2/8] Move the get_net() from sock_copy() Pavel Emelyanov
2007-11-01  7:32   ` David Miller
2007-10-31 13:47 ` [PATCH 3/8] Cleanup the allocation/freeing of the sock object Pavel Emelyanov
2007-11-01  7:34   ` David Miller
2007-10-31 13:48 ` [PATCH 4/8] Auto-zero the allocated " Pavel Emelyanov
2007-11-01  7:35   ` David Miller
2007-10-31 13:51 ` Pavel Emelyanov [this message]
2007-11-01  7:36   ` [PATCH 5/8] Move some core sock setup into sk_prot_alloc David Miller
2007-10-31 13:54 ` [PATCH 6/8] Make the sk_clone() lighter Pavel Emelyanov
2007-11-01  7:26   ` David Miller
2007-11-01  8:46     ` Pavel Emelyanov
2007-11-01  7:38   ` David Miller
2007-10-31 13:56 ` [PATCH 7/8] Remove bogus zero_it argument from sk_alloc Pavel Emelyanov
2007-11-01  7:38   ` David Miller
2007-10-31 13:59 ` [PATCH 8/8] Forget the zero_it argument of sk_alloc() Pavel Emelyanov
2007-11-01  7:41   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47288877.10803@openvz.org \
    --to=xemul@openvz.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devel@openvz.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).