From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rick Jones Subject: Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device? Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:04:12 -0700 Message-ID: <472A4D5C.2070301@hp.com> References: <4729EAFF.9050606@candelatech.com> <18218.18134.353553.189622@zeus.sw.starentnetworks.com> <472A49BD.6000802@hp.com> <20071101.145956.63020380.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: djohnson+linux-kernel@sw.starentnetworks.com, greearb@candelatech.com, shemminger@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bguo@sw.starentnetworks.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from palrel12.hp.com ([156.153.255.237]:36260 "EHLO palrel12.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753582AbXKAWEO (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Nov 2007 18:04:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20071101.145956.63020380.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org David Miller wrote: > From: Rick Jones > Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:48:45 -0700 > > >>One could I suppose try to ammend the information passed to allow >>tcpdump to say "oh, this was a tx packet on the same machine on >>which I am tracing so don't worry about checksum mismatch" > > > We do this already! I'll try to go pester folks in tcpdump-workers then. rick