From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
ak@suse.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org, acme@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] INET : removes per bucket rwlock in tcp/dccp ehash table
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 19:15:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <472E0C24.9040009@o2.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <472E0857.4080405@o2.pl>
Jarek Poplawski wrote, On 11/04/2007 06:58 PM:
> Eric Dumazet wrote, On 11/04/2007 12:31 PM:
...
>> +static inline int inet_ehash_locks_alloc(struct inet_hashinfo *hashinfo)
>> +{
...
>> + if (sizeof(rwlock_t) != 0) {
...
>> + for (i = 0; i < size; i++)
>> + rwlock_init(&hashinfo->ehash_locks[i]);
>
>
> This looks better now, but still is doubtful to me: even if it's safe with
> current rwlock implementation, can't we imagine some new debugging or
> statistical code added, which would be called from rwlock_init() without
> using rwlock_t structure? IMHO, if read_lock() etc. are called in such a
> case, rwlock_init() should be done as well.
Of course I mean: if sizeof(rwlock_t) == 0.
Jarek P
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-04 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-01 10:16 [PATCH] INET : removes per bucket rwlock in tcp/dccp ehash table Eric Dumazet
2007-11-01 11:03 ` David Miller
2007-11-01 11:20 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2007-11-01 11:15 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2007-11-01 16:06 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-11-01 18:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-11-01 16:14 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-11-01 17:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-11-01 18:48 ` Rick Jones
2007-11-01 19:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-11-01 19:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-11-01 21:52 ` David Miller
2007-11-01 21:46 ` David Miller
2007-11-03 23:18 ` Andi Kleen
2007-11-03 23:23 ` David Miller
2007-11-04 0:54 ` Andi Kleen
2007-11-04 11:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-11-04 12:26 ` Andi Kleen
2007-11-04 13:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-11-04 21:56 ` David Miller
2007-11-04 23:01 ` Andi Kleen
2007-11-05 4:24 ` David Miller
2007-11-05 4:35 ` David Miller
2007-11-04 17:58 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-11-04 18:15 ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2007-11-04 21:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-11-04 23:08 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-11-07 10:41 ` David Miller
2007-11-07 12:13 ` Jarek Poplawski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=472E0C24.9040009@o2.pl \
--to=jarkao2@o2.pl \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).