netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
To: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>,
	Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>, Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, kkeil@suse.de
Subject: Re: Why does a connect to IPv6 LLA address fail ?
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 15:50:52 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <473376AC.7010808@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071108183221.GA17878@pingi.kke.suse.de>

Karsten Keil wrote:
> 
> OK I run into this issue while running the TAHI testsuite. The test is as
> follows:
> 
>   Check 03:
>     DNS Address: fec0::9
>     Candidate Source Addresses: fec0::1(SS) or LLA(LS)
>     Destination Address List: 3fff::2(GS) or fe80::2(LS)
>     Result: fe80::2 (src LLA) then 3fff::2 (src fec0::1)
> 
>     Scope(fe80::2) = Scope(LLA) and Scope(3fff::2) <> Scope(fec0::1), then prefer fe80::2
> 
> the nameserver send following answer for the query:
> 
> | | | | DNS_Question                    (length:21)
> | | | | | DNS_QuestionEntry               (length:21)
> | | | | | | Name                             = server.tahi.org.
> | | | | | | Type                             = 28 (AAAA)
> | | | | | | Class                            = 1
> | | | | DNS_Answer                      (length:86)
> | | | | | DNS_RR_AAAA                     (length:43)
> | | | | | | Name                             = server.tahi.org.
> | | | | | | Type                             = 28
> | | | | | | Class                            = 1
> | | | | | | TTL                              = 0
> | | | | | | Length                           = 16
> | | | | | | Address                          = 3fff::2
> | | | | | DNS_RR_AAAA                     (length:43)
> | | | | | | Name                             = server.tahi.org.
> | | | | | | Type                             = 28
> | | | | | | Class                            = 1
> | | | | | | TTL                              = 0
> | | | | | | Length                           = 16
> | | | | | | Address                          = fe80::2
> 
> 
> 
> So how we should handle this issue, claim that the test is wrong, the test
> should not use LLA for this ?
> 

You could argue that a DNS server should not return link-local addresses because there
is no way for the DNS server to specify a correct zone.

I believe this is actually documented somewhere...

-vlad


      reply	other threads:[~2007-11-08 20:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-07  9:40 Why does a connect to IPv6 LLA address fail ? Karsten Keil
2007-11-07 11:28 ` Jiri Bohac
2007-11-07 19:42   ` Vlad Yasevich
2007-11-08 18:01     ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2007-11-08 18:15       ` Vlad Yasevich
2007-11-08 18:32         ` Karsten Keil
2007-11-08 20:50           ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=473376AC.7010808@hp.com \
    --to=vladislav.yasevich@hp.com \
    --cc=agruen@suse.de \
    --cc=jbohac@suse.cz \
    --cc=kkeil@suse.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).