From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: UDP-Lite and /proc/net/snmp Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 14:55:21 +0100 Message-ID: <4735B849.4020700@cosmosbay.com> References: <20071110131428.GA6447@gondor.apana.org.au> <20071110.223243.114494952.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: =?UTF-8?B?WU9TSElGVUpJIEhpZGVha2kgLyDlkInol6Toi7HmmI4=?= Return-path: Received: from gw1.cosmosbay.com ([86.65.150.130]:50091 "EHLO gw1.cosmosbay.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751214AbXKJN4H (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Nov 2007 08:56:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20071110.223243.114494952.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / =E5=90=89=E8=97=A4=E8=8B=B1=E6=98=8E a =C3=A9crit : > In article <20071110131428.GA6447@gondor.apana.org.au> (at Sat, 10 No= v 2007 21:14:29 +0800), Herbert Xu says: >=20 >> It looks like the addition of UDP-Lite has upset netstat: >> >> $ netstat -s >> Ip: > : >> Udp: >> 30 packets received >> 0 packets to unknown port received. >> 0 packet receive errors >> 17 packets sent >> UdpLite: >> error parsing /proc/net/snmp: Success >> $ >> >> Should we remove it again or let it stay this time? >=20 > Hmm? netstat 1.42 (net-tools 1.60) seems fine. > Which netstat are you using? >=20 I have the same problem with a netstat 1.42 (debian x86_64 lenny/sid)