From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/05] ipv6: RFC4214 Support (3) Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:11:38 -0800 Message-ID: <473A838A.5060603@linux-foundation.org> References: <473371B3.5030908@yahoo.com> <4734FCEF.3080301@yahoo.com> <20071113125312.4c4d1391@freepuppy.rosehill> <20071113.210513.157206334.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: osprey67@yahoo.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:39072 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750984AbXKNFLk (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:11:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20071113.210513.157206334.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org David Miller wrote: > From: Stephen Hemminger > Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 12:53:12 -0800 > > >> On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:35:59 -0800 >> osprey67 wrote: >> >> >>> From: Fred L. Templin >>> >>> This message attaches the combined diffs from >>> messages 01/05 through 04/05. This file should be >>> suitable for use with the patch utility. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Fred L. Templin >>> >>> >> Isn't increasing the size of struct ip_tunnel_parm >> going to cause kernel ABI changes? >> > > Yeah it is, unfortunately. > So we can't take it. It might be possible to extend the structure if you put the new parameters at the end and handled the compatibility cases correctly.