From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
devel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove notifier block from chain when register_netdevice_notifier fails
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:47:24 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <473AFC6C.6000505@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071114133717.GA14746@gondor.apana.org.au>
Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 03:08:03PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>> Commit fcc5a03ac42564e9e255c1134dda47442289e466 makes the
>> register_netdevice_notifier() handle the error from the
>> NETDEV_REGISTER event, sent to the registering block.
>>
>> The bad news is that in this case the notifier block is
>> not removed from the list, but the error is returned to the
>> caller. In case the caller is in module init function and
>> handles this error this can abort the module loading. The
>> notifier block will be then removed from the kernel, but
>> will be left in the list. Oops :(
>>
>> I think that the notifier block should be removed from the
>> chain in case of error, regardless whether this error is
>> handled by the caller or not. In the worst case (the error
>> is _not_ handled) module will not receive the events any
>> longer.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
>
> Good catch. Thanks Pavel!
>
> Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Thanks :)
BTW, I have one more question I can't find the answer to by
myself. Why the unregister_netdevice_notifier doesn't produce
the GOING_DOWN-DOWN-UNREGISTER event sequence for the notifier
block which is being unregistered? Was this made deliberately?
Pavel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-14 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-14 12:08 [PATCH] Remove notifier block from chain when register_netdevice_notifier fails Pavel Emelyanov
2007-11-14 13:37 ` Herbert Xu
2007-11-14 13:47 ` Pavel Emelyanov [this message]
2007-11-14 13:50 ` Herbert Xu
2007-11-14 23:53 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=473AFC6C.6000505@openvz.org \
--to=xemul@openvz.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).